首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

喀斯特石漠化皆伐迹地不同微地形和小生境下的土壤侵蚀差异
引用本文:殷清慧,谢世友,蔡先立.喀斯特石漠化皆伐迹地不同微地形和小生境下的土壤侵蚀差异[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):44-47,53.
作者姓名:殷清慧  谢世友  蔡先立
作者单位:西南大学地理科学学院;安顺学院资源与环境工程学院;西南大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室;贵州省普定喀斯特生态系统观测研究站
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划项目"重庆北碚中梁山喀斯特槽谷石漠化综合治理技术与示范"(2011BAC09B01), "重庆地区喀斯特山地退化生态系统恢复与重建技术开发" (2006BAC01A16);贵州省科技厅联合基金项目(黔科合J字(2013)13号)
摘    要:目的]探讨喀斯特山区皆伐迹地不同微地形、小生境下土壤侵蚀的差异,为喀斯特皆伐迹地生态修复及防治提供依据。方法]研究区采用铁栏围成封闭区域,用测钎法以1m×1m的距离布设测钎,对山地不同微地形、小生境的土壤侵蚀进行原位年监测,用箱图比较其土壤侵蚀深度差异,并作显著性分析。结果]研究区不同微地形、不同小生境在土壤侵蚀程度上差异明显,微地形土壤侵蚀深度总体呈现为:凸形平直形凹形,微地形与土壤侵蚀呈显著相关。小生境土壤侵蚀平均深度表现为:石沟石土面石侧土面石缝,组间小生境与土壤侵蚀无明显相关,但石沟与土面呈现显著相关。结论]岩溶区山地皆伐迹地应据微地形、小生境不同,实施差异化生态修复及防治工作,凸形微地形和石沟、石土面小生境是防治的关键。

关 键 词:石漠化  皆伐迹地  微地形  小生境  土壤侵蚀
收稿时间:2018/10/12 0:00:00
修稿时间:2018/11/15 0:00:00

Differences of Soil Erosion Between Micro-topography and Microhabitat in Clear-cutting Site of Karst Rocky Desertification Area
Yin Qinghui,Xie Shiyou and Cai Xianli.Differences of Soil Erosion Between Micro-topography and Microhabitat in Clear-cutting Site of Karst Rocky Desertification Area[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2019,39(4):44-47,53.
Authors:Yin Qinghui  Xie Shiyou and Cai Xianli
Institution:School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;School of Resource and Environment Project, Anshun University, Anshun, Guizhou 561000, China,School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region''s Eco-environment(Ministry of Education), Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China and Puding Karst Ecosystem Research Station, Puding, Guizhou 561000, China
Abstract:Objective] The differences of soil erosion between micro-topography, microhabitat in clear-cutting site of the karst region were studied in order to provide suggestions for ecological restoration and control in clear-cutting site of the karst region.Methods] Soil erosion monitoring method of pin was employed to monitor annually soil erosion in situ (differentmicro-topography, microhabitat) at a distance of 1 m×1 m within a research area enclosed by iron bars, and box chart and significance test were utilized to compare the difference of soil erosion between them.Results] It was found that significant difference in the degree of soil erosion of different micro-topography and microhabitats in the study area. More specifically, depth of soil erosion of micro-topography manifested an overall scale of convex > flat > concave, while depth of soil erosion of microhabitat demonstrated an overall scale of stone-drain > stone soil surface > the side of stone > soil surface > rock tunnels. There was a significant correlation between micro-topography and soil erosion, while no significant correlation existed between microhabitats and soil erosion in groups, but stone-drain and soil surface were respectively correlate to each other significantly.Conclusion] Ecological restoration and control should be carried out according to different micro-topography and microhabitat in karst mountain clear cutting site, and the key of control lied in the convex micro-topography, the microhabitat of stone-drain and stone soil surface.
Keywords:rocky desertification  clear-cutting site  micro-topography  microhabitat  soil erosion
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水土保持通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水土保持通报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号