首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

连云港市云台山宜林荒山立地质量分类及评价
引用本文:张勇,李土生,潘江灵,胡海波,周子贵,张晓勉.连云港市云台山宜林荒山立地质量分类及评价[J].水土保持通报,2014(3):171-177.
作者姓名:张勇  李土生  潘江灵  胡海波  周子贵  张晓勉
作者单位:南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210037;浙江省林业生态工程管理中心, 浙江杭州 310020;浙江省林业生态工程管理中心, 浙江杭州 310020;浙江省林业基金管理服务中心, 浙江杭州 310020;南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院, 江苏南京 210037;浙江省林业生态工程管理中心, 浙江杭州 310020;浙江省林业科学研究院, 浙江杭州 310023
基金项目:国家林业局重点项目"长江三角洲城市森林生态系统定位研究(2001-5)"; 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目
摘    要:以江苏省连云港市云台山22个宜林荒山地段为研究对象,共选取了16个立地因子,将其分成宏观因子和微观因子分别进行立地质量分类及评价,最后再综合起来评价。评价结果表明,22个地段最终分成5类。第1类主要特征为土层中上偏厚,宏观立地质量相对较好,土壤质量中等,包括2个地段;第2类为土层中上偏厚,宏观立地质量相对较好,土壤质量差,包括4个地段;第3类为土层中下偏薄,宏观立地质量相对一般,土壤质量中等,包括7个地段;第4类为土层中下偏薄,宏观立地质量相对一般,土壤质量差,包括7个地段;第5类主为土层非常薄,宏观立地质量很差,土壤质量中等,包括2个地段。综合分析表明,研究区立地质量整体不高,今后绿化造林任务十分艰巨。

关 键 词:立地质量  分类评价  土壤  云台山
收稿时间:2013/10/16 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/10/30 0:00:00

Site Quality Classification and Assessment in Barren Hills for Suitable Afforestation in Yuntai Mountains of Lianyungang City
ZHANG Yong,LI Tu-sheng,PAN Jiang-ling,HU Hai-bo,ZHOU Zi-gui and ZHANG Xiao-mian.Site Quality Classification and Assessment in Barren Hills for Suitable Afforestation in Yuntai Mountains of Lianyungang City[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2014(3):171-177.
Authors:ZHANG Yong  LI Tu-sheng  PAN Jiang-ling  HU Hai-bo  ZHOU Zi-gui and ZHANG Xiao-mian
Institution:College of Forest Resources and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China;Zhejiang Forestry Ecological Engineering Management Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310020, China;Zhejiang Forestry Ecological Engineering Management Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310020, China;Zhejiang Forestry Fund Management and Service Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310020, China;College of Forest Resources and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210037, China;Zhejiang Forestry Ecological Engineering Management Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310020, China;Zhejiang Forestry Academy, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China
Abstract:By taking the 22 barren hills for suitable afforestation in the Yuntai Mountains of Lianyungang City as the research object, 16 site factors were selected and divided into macroscopic and microcosmic factors to conduct site quality classification and assessment, respectively. In the end, the classification and assessment results were combined. Results are as follows: The 22 hills could be divided into five types. The main features of the first type, consisting of 2 hills, had a medium or superior thickness of soil layer, relatively fine site quality of macroscopic factor and medium soil quality; the second type, consisting of 4 hills, a medium or superior thickness of soil layer, relatively fine site quality of macroscopic factor and poor soil quality; the third type, consisting of 7 hills, a medium or inferior thickness of soil layer, relatively medium site quality of macroscopic factor and medium soil quality; the fourth type, consisting of 7 hills, a medium or inferior thickness of soil layer, relatively medium site quality of macroscopic factor and poor soil quality; and the fifth type, consisting of 2 hills, a very thin thickness of soil layer, relatively very poor site quality of macroscopic factor and medium soil quality. In summary, the site quality in the research area is not fine as a whole, and afforestation will be very difficult in the future.
Keywords:site quality  classification and assessment  soil  Yuntai Mountains
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水土保持通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水土保持通报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号