首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

冀北山地不同林分枯落物及土壤的水源涵养功能评价
引用本文:张伟,杨新兵,张汝松,曹云生,姚卫星.冀北山地不同林分枯落物及土壤的水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):208-212,238.
作者姓名:张伟  杨新兵  张汝松  曹云生  姚卫星
作者单位:1. 河北农业大学林学院国家北方山区农业工程技术研究中心,河北保定,071000
2. 河北木兰围场国有林场管理局,河北承德,068450
基金项目:林业公益性行业科研专项“冀北山区典型森林生态系统健康经营技术研究与示范”(200804022F)
摘    要:以冀北山地6种典型林分为对象,对其凋落物及表层土壤的水源涵养功能进行了初步研究。结果表明,各林分枯落物有效拦蓄量排序为:山杨林(32.32 t/hm2)〉白桦林(28.59 t/hm2)〉蒙古栎林(20.26t/hm2)〉油松蒙古栎混交林(19.49 t/hm2)〉华北落叶松林(13.53 t/hm2)〉油松林(13.23 t/hm2);各林分土壤最大持水量排序为:山杨林(1 709 t/hm2)〉油松蒙古栎混交林(1 551 t/hm2)〉白桦林(1 549 t/hm2)〉油松林(1 547 t/hm2)〉华北落叶松林(1 357 t/hm2)〉蒙古栎林(1 303 t/hm2);各林分土壤渗透性能排序为:油松蒙古栎混交林〉山杨林〉白桦林〉油松林〉蒙古栎林〉华北落叶松林。采用层次分析法确定指标权重,对评价指标值进行计算分析,比较不同林分综合水源涵养功能,结果认为,油松蒙古栎混交林的综合水源涵养功能最好,其次为山杨林、白桦林、蒙古栎林、油松林,华北落叶松林最差。

关 键 词:冀北山地  水源涵养  林分类型  层次分析法
收稿时间:2010/8/24 0:00:00
修稿时间:2010/12/6 0:00:00

Evaluation on Water Conservation Functions of Litter and Soils Under Different Forests in Mountainous Area of Northern Hebei Province
ZHANG Wei,YANG Xin-bing,ZHANG Ru-song,CAO Yun-sheng and YAO Wei-xing.Evaluation on Water Conservation Functions of Litter and Soils Under Different Forests in Mountainous Area of Northern Hebei Province[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2011,31(3):208-212,238.
Authors:ZHANG Wei  YANG Xin-bing  ZHANG Ru-song  CAO Yun-sheng and YAO Wei-xing
Institution:1.The Center of National Northern Mountainous Areas of Agricultural EngineeringResearch,College of Forest,Agricultural University of Hebei Province,Baoding,Hebei 071000,China;2.State-owned Forest Bureau of Mulan-Weichang in Hebei Province,Chengde,Hebei 068450,China)
Abstract:Experiments were conducted to study the water conservation functions of litter and surface soil under six forest types in mountainous area of Northern Hebei Province.The results show that in terms of effective interception capacity,the rank of litter layers was poplar forest( 32.32 t/hm2)>birch forest(28.59t/hm2)>Mongolian oak forest(20.26t/hm2)>chinese pine-Mongolian oak mixed forest(19.49t/hm2)>Larix principis-rup prechtii forest( 13.53 t/ hm2)>chinese pine forest(13.23t/hm2);in terms of soil maximum water-holding capacity,the order was poplar forest> chinese pine-Mongolian oak mixed forest>birch forest>chinese pine forest>Larix princip is:rupprechtii forest> Mongolian oak forest; regarding soil infiltration characteristics,the rank was chinese pine-Mongolian oak mixed forest> poplar forest> birch forest> chinese pine forest> Mongolian oak forest> Larix principis - rupp rechtii forest.The values of evaluation indices were calculated based on weights that were determined using the method of hierarchy analysis.The evaluation results show that chinese pine-Mongolianoak mixed forest had the best water conservation function,followed in order by poplar forest,birch forest,Mongolian oak forest,chinese pine forest,and Larix principis-rup prechtii forest had the worst.
Keywords:the mountainous of Northern Hebei Province  water conservation  forest type  analytical hierarchy
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水土保持通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水土保持通报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号