首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

水源保护区坡耕地不同种植模式水土保持效应试验
引用本文:潘艳华,朱红业,雷宝坤,郭玉蓉,王应学,和寿甲,付丽波.水源保护区坡耕地不同种植模式水土保持效应试验[J].中国水土保持科学,2013(5):14-19.
作者姓名:潘艳华  朱红业  雷宝坤  郭玉蓉  王应学  和寿甲  付丽波
作者单位:云南省农业科学院农业环境资源研究所,昆明650205
基金项目:云南省科技厅社会发展计划“高原湖泊农业面源污染减控及零排放技术应用研究与示范”(2011CA010);农业部948项目“亚热带山区保护性农业关键技术引进及示范”(2012-Z56);昆明市生物资源开发创新“水源保护区植草净水养畜综合试验示范”(KMKJ2008-11)
摘    要:在水源保护区16.5°的坡耕地上,通过3种种植模式(玉米+小麦、牧草混播、黄梨+绿肥)进行连续3年水土保持试验,研究水源保护区坡耕地水土保持效应。结果表明:1)与玉米+小麦习惯轮作模式相比,牧草混播及黄梨+绿肥种植模式降低径流量、土壤流失量、养分流失量分别为27.7%、44.2%、38.0%及14.4%、20.9%、27.9%,牧草混播及黄梨+绿肥2种种植模式都能有效地降低水土及养分流失,并且效果随着年限延长而增加;2)在肥料施用量比玉米+小麦种植模式减少34.0%的条件下,牧草混播种植模式的纯收益仍能与玉米+小麦轮作模式持平;黄梨+绿肥种植模式纯收益比玉米+小麦种植模式提高5.9%,梨树盛果期以后,产值还有很大提升空间;3)从水土保持角度看,牧草混播种植模式的效果最好,从经济角度分析,黄梨+绿肥种植模式效益最高,二者都可作为水源保护区种植结构调整及坡耕地综合治理的较好模式。

关 键 词:水源保护区  坡耕地  种植模式  水土保持  综合效应

Soil and water conservation effects of different cropping patterns in slope croplands in water conservation areas
Pan Yanhua,Zhu Hongye,Lei Baokun,Guo Institute of Agricultural Environment & Resources,Yunnan Yurong,Wang Yingxue,He Shoujia,Fu Libo.Soil and water conservation effects of different cropping patterns in slope croplands in water conservation areas[J].Science of Soil and Water Conservation,2013(5):14-19.
Authors:Pan Yanhua  Zhu Hongye  Lei Baokun  Guo Institute of Agricultural Environment & Resources  Yunnan Yurong  Wang Yingxue  He Shoujia  Fu Libo
Institution:Academy of Agricultural Science, 650205, Kunming, China)
Abstract:The effects of soil and water conservation by three cropping patterns (Zea mays L. plus Triticum aestivum crop rotation, multiple forage seeding pattern, and Pyrus sorotina plus green manure pattern) were studied in slope croplands of 16.5~ in water conservation areas. The three-year monitoring data showed that, compared with the Zea mays L. plus Triticum aestivum crop rotation, the multiple tbrage seeding pattern could effectively decrease the soil erosion and nutrient loss, the volume of runoff, soil loss and nutrients loss by 27.7% , 44.2% and 38.0% , respectively, while the Pyrus sorotina plus green manure pattern decreased these indexes by 14.4% , 20.9% and 27.9% , respectively, and the effects were strengthened over time. In comparison with the Zea mays L. plus Triticum aestivum crop rotation, the multiple forage seeding pattern could still gain equivalent net income even when reducing the application of' fertilizers by 34.0%. The net income of Pyrus sorotina plus green manure pattern increased by 5.9% compared with the Zea mays L. plus Triticum aestivum crop rotation. In addition, the Pyrus sorotina yield still has great potential to rise after full productive period. From the perspective of soil and water conservation, the multiple forage seeding pattern has the best effects; while from the economic point of view, the Pyrus sorotina plus green manure pattern produces the highest benefit. Both of them can be considered as optimum schemes to modulate the cropping patterns and manage slope croplands comprehensively in water conservation areas.
Keywords:water conservation area  slope cropland  cropping pattern  soil and water conservation  comprehensive effects
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号