首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

耕作方式对华北农田土壤固碳效应的影响
引用本文:魏燕华,赵 鑫,翟云龙,张二朋,陈 阜,张海林.耕作方式对华北农田土壤固碳效应的影响[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(17):87-95.
作者姓名:魏燕华  赵 鑫  翟云龙  张二朋  陈 阜  张海林
作者单位:中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院,农业部农作制度重点开放实验室,北京 100193
基金项目:国家自然基金项目(31171510)
摘    要:研究不同耕作方式对华北农田土壤固碳及碳库管理指数的影响,可为探寻有利于农田固碳的耕作方式提供科学依据。该研究在中国农业大学吴桥实验站进行,试验于2008年设置了免耕秸秆不还田(NT0)、翻耕秸秆不还田(CT0)、免耕秸秆还田(NT)、翻耕秸秆还田(CT)和旋耕秸秆还田(RT)5个处理。研究测定分析了土壤容重、有机碳、易氧化有机碳含量及不同耕作方式下的碳库管理指数。通过对不同耕作方式下0~110cm土壤的分析,结果表明,随着土层的加深,土壤有机碳含量不断下降,NT显著增加了表层(0~10cm)土壤有机碳含量,而>10~50cm有机碳含量较其他处理(NT0除外)有所下降,深层(>50~110cm)处理间差异不明显;土壤容重与有机碳含量呈显著的负相关关系(P<0.01);0~30cm土层有机碳储量以NT最高,CT与其无明显差异,二者较CT0分别高出13.1%和11.0%,而至0~50cm土层,CT的碳储量最高,但与NT无显著差异(P<0.05);与CT0相比,NT0降低了各层土壤易氧化有机碳含量,而NT则在0~10cm土层表现为增加;RT、CT分别显著增加了0~10、>10~30cm土层的碳库管理指数。结果表明,秸秆还田可改善土壤质量,提高农田碳库管理指数,同时碳库管理指数受耕作方式的影响也较大,尤其是CT和RT;NT通过减少土壤扰动、增加有机质的输入,可提高上层土壤有机碳的储量。

关 键 词:土壤    有机碳  耕作方式  有机碳储量  碳库管理指数
收稿时间:2013/5/21 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/7/13 0:00:00

Effects of tillages on soil organic carbon sequestration in North China Plain
Wei Yanhu,Zhao Xin,Zhai Yunlong,Zhang Erpeng,Chen Fu and Zhang Hailin.Effects of tillages on soil organic carbon sequestration in North China Plain[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2013,29(17):87-95.
Authors:Wei Yanhu  Zhao Xin  Zhai Yunlong  Zhang Erpeng  Chen Fu and Zhang Hailin
Institution:Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Abstract:Soil organic carbon (SOC) pool plays an important role in mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, long-term conventional tillage practices can result in significant losses of soil organic matter (SOM), thus inducing an increase in soil erosion and increasing CO2 efflux. In addition, burning straw is another important emission sources of GHG in the North China Plain (NCP). In order to identify the best tillage practices for SOC sequestration under the wheat-maize cropping system in this region, we investigated the effects of tillage on SOC concentration, SOC stock, the carbon pool management index (CMI), and SOC distribution in the soil profile. This study was conducted at the Wuqiao Experiment Station in Hebei Province from 2008. Five different treatments were established, including no-till without straw retention (NT0), conventional tillage without straw retention (CT0), no-till with straw retention (NT), conventional tillage with straw retention (CT), and rotary tillage with straw retention (RT). Soil samples were taken after harvesting of wheat, and soil bulk density (BD), SOC, and labile organic carbon (LOC) were analyzed. The results showed that NT0 significantly increased BD in all soil layers (0~50 cm) (P<0.05). Concentration of SOC decreased with an increased depth (0-110 cm) among all treatments. NT significantly increased the SOC concentration at the topsoil (0-10 cm) compared with the other treatments. Concentration of SOC under NT was 34.4% higher than that under CT0 at 0-5 cm depth. However, SOC under NT was lower compared with other treatments (except NT0) in >10-50 cm, but there was no significant difference among the treatments deep layers (>50-110 cm). The relationship between BD and SOC concentration showed a strong negative correlation. In order to reduce the bias caused by variations in bulk density under different tillage treatments, the equivalent soil mass method was used in calculating SOC stock. At the depth of 0~30 cm, the total SOC stock under NT was the highest (40.73 Mg/hm2) among all the treatments, and there was no significant difference in SOC stock between CT and NT, but those were 13.1% and 11.0% higher than CT0, respectively. However, for the 0-50cm depth, the SOC stock in CT was highest, but no significant difference with NT (P<0.05). Compared with CT0, NT0 reduced the LOC concentration in all soil layers, but NT increased at 0-10cm soil layers. The carbon management index (CMI) under RT were 21.7 % and 32.3% higher than NT at 0-5 and 5-10 cm depth, respectively, but no significant difference occurred at both >10-20 cm and >20-30 cm. However, CMI under CT was higher than that under NT, NT0 and CT0 at all soil depths. Results of that indicated that crop straw retention could increase soil quality and increase CMI that was also strongly affected by tillage management. In conclusion, NT reduced soil disturbance and increased the input of SOM, which was beneficial in SOC storage, especially at the surface layers. Nonetheless, the results of this study were based on short-term tillage experiments in SOC concentration/stock. Therefore, a long-time study may reveal the changes in SOC and its mechanism under conservation tillage because of the duration effects. These data also suggest sampling subsoil layers to understand the underpinning processes governing SOC sequestration.
Keywords:Soils  carbon  organic carbon  tillage practices  soil organic carbon stock  carbon pool management index
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号