首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

施肥对冬小麦的水分调亏灌溉效应的影响
引用本文:马守臣,张绪成,段爱旺,杨慎骄,孙景生.施肥对冬小麦的水分调亏灌溉效应的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(6):139-143.
作者姓名:马守臣  张绪成  段爱旺  杨慎骄  孙景生
作者单位:1. 中国农科院农田灌溉研究所 农业部作物需水与调控重点实验室,新乡 453003;河南理工大学 测绘与国土信息工程学院,焦作454000;甘肃省农业科学院,农业部西北作物抗旱栽培与耕作重点开放实验室,兰州730070
2. 甘肃省农业科学院,农业部西北作物抗旱栽培与耕作重点开放实验室,兰州730070
3. 中国农科院农田灌溉研究所 农业部作物需水与调控重点实验室,新乡,453003
基金项目:现代农业小麦产业技术体系(Nycytx-03)专项经费;中国博士后科学基金(20100470423);农业部作物需水与调控重点实验室开放基金(CWRR200904)
摘    要:为了研究冬小麦在不同施肥条件下的调亏灌溉效应,通过小区试验设置了不施肥(F0)、单施复合肥(F1)和复合肥+有机肥配施(F2)三种施肥处理,并在返青-拔节期对冬小麦进行了适当的水分亏缺处理。结果表明,与F0和F1处理相比,F2处理的小麦,在水分亏缺期间光合速率没有受到显著影响,但复水后光合速率表现超补偿效应。到花期时,F2处理的调亏灌溉下小麦的叶面积、株高、每茎干质量和成穗数与未调亏灌溉时没有显著差别。抽穗后,在充分供水条件下,返青-拔节期水分亏缺对F2处理小麦的产量没有显著影响,但对F0和F1处理小麦的产量有显著负效应;在自然干旱条件下,水分亏缺对F2处理小麦的产量有显著的正效应。F2处理下,小麦的稳产性显著高于F0和F1处理。可见,在3种施肥处理条件下,复合肥与有机肥配施处理时冬小麦的调亏灌溉效应最好。

关 键 词:施肥  灌溉  试验  冬小麦  稳产性
收稿时间:8/2/2011 12:00:00 AM
修稿时间:2012/2/22 0:00:00

Regulated deficit irrigation effect of winter wheat under different fertilization treatments
Ma Shouchen,Zhang Xucheng,Duan Aiwang,Yang Shenjiao and Sun Jingsheng.Regulated deficit irrigation effect of winter wheat under different fertilization treatments[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2012,28(6):139-143.
Authors:Ma Shouchen  Zhang Xucheng  Duan Aiwang  Yang Shenjiao and Sun Jingsheng
Institution:1 (1. Key Lab for Crop Water Requirement and Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453003 China; 2. School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Northwest Crop Drought-resistant Farming, Ministry of Agriculture, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, China)
Abstract:A plot experiment was conducted to explore regulated deficit irrigation effects of winter wheat under different fertilization treatments: no fertilizer (F0), compound fertilizer (F1) and fertilizer + compound fertilizer (F2), and with appropriate water deficit treatment at the returning green-jointing stage. The results showed that water deficit at the returning green-jointing stage had no significant effect on photosynthesis of winter wheat under F2 condition, F2 had super-compensation effect in photosynthesis after re-watering, compared to F0 and F1 treatments. At anthesis stage, there were no significant differences on leaf area, plant height, dry matter mass per shoot and spike number between regulated deficit irrigation and well-watered wheat under F2 condition. Under well-water condition after heading stage, water deficit treatment at returning green-jointing stage had no significant effect on grain yield of wheat with F2, but significantly reduced grain yields of wheat under F0 and F1 conditions; under the progressive soil dying condition after heading, water deficit treatment at returning green-jointing improved grain yield of wheat under F2 condition, and yield stability of regulated deficit irrigation wheat with F2 was higher than those with F0 and F1. It is suggested that the fertilizer + compound fertilizer treatment has optimal regulated deficit irrigation effect for winter wheat.
Keywords:fertilizer  irrigation  experiments  winter wheat  yield stability
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号