首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

用分时段修正双源模型估算南京地区冬小麦生育期蒸散量
引用本文:刘春伟,曾勰婷,邱让建.用分时段修正双源模型估算南京地区冬小麦生育期蒸散量[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(Z1):80-87.
作者姓名:刘春伟  曾勰婷  邱让建
作者单位:1. 南京信息工程大学应用气象学院,江苏省农业气象重点实验室,南京 210044;2. 农业部规划设计研究院设施农业研究所,北京,100125
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51321001, 51309132);江苏省高校自然科学研究面上项目(13KJB170015);江苏省基础研究计划青年基金项目(BK20130995)。
摘    要:冬小麦是南京地区重要的粮食作物,模拟冬小麦蒸散量(evapotranspiration,ET)并研究其对气象因素的响应可为冬小麦田间水分管理提供参考。该文基于大型称重式蒸渗仪实际测定值分析了冬小麦ET变化规律,分别采用单源模型(Penman-Monteith,PM)和双源模型(Shuttleworth-Wallace,SW)模拟不同时期冬小麦ET,并探讨分时段修正SW模型的模拟方法,在此基础上,分析了ET对气象因素的响应。结果表明,生育初期,冬小麦的ET逐步增加,进入越冬期则逐步降低并保持在较低水平。返青期和拔节期ET迅速增加,开花和成熟期又保持稳定。2011-2012和2013-2014年分时段采用SW模型估算整个生育期冬小麦的蒸散量比整个生育期采用单一估算模型能够减小模拟平均绝对误差0.01~0.04 mm/h。小麦乳熟成熟期采用最小气孔阻力150 s/m计算的修正SW模型可以比整个生育期用单一最小气孔阻力的SW模型降低冬小麦蒸发蒸腾量的估算平均绝对误差0.03~0.13 mm/h。冬小麦蒸发蒸腾量与气象因素密切相关,与净辐射、空气温度和饱和水汽压差等环境因素决定系数顺序为净辐射饱和水汽压差空气温度风速。这表明南京地区冬小麦蒸发蒸腾量主要决定因素为净辐射。该研究能够为冬小麦蒸散量的模拟方法以及田间水分管理提供参考。

关 键 词:蒸发蒸腾量  模型  作物  南京地区  冬小麦  Penman-Monteith模型  Shuttleworth-Wallace模型
收稿时间:5/8/2015 12:00:00 AM
修稿时间:2015/6/11 0:00:00

Simulated total evapotranspiration of winter wheat with modified Shuttleworth-Wallace model in different stages in Nanjing
Liu Chunwei,Zeng Xieting and Qiu Rangjian.Simulated total evapotranspiration of winter wheat with modified Shuttleworth-Wallace model in different stages in Nanjing[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2016,32(Z1):80-87.
Authors:Liu Chunwei  Zeng Xieting and Qiu Rangjian
Institution:1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, College of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,2. Institute of Protected Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China and 1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, College of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Abstract:Winter wheat is an important food crop in Nanjing. In order to investigate the water management and increase the yield, it is crucial to investigate the precise water consumption of winter wheat and its influencing factors. Using the data of measured evapotranspiration (ET) with weighing lysimeter and meteorology factors from automatic weather station during 2011-2012 and 2013-2014, we analyzed the seasonal variation of winter wheat ET and simulated the ET using Penman-Monteith (PM) and Shuttleworth-Wallace (SW) model in 4 different periods from sowing to harvest in the experiment site of Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (118.8 °E, 32.0 °N, with an altitude of 32 m). The site belonged to subtropical monsoon climate, with an average annual temperature of 15.6 ℃ and an average annual rainfall of 1 106 mm. The soil was yellow brunisolic soil with a field capacity of 0.30 cm3/cm3. The weighing lysimeter had an effective evapotranspiration area of 4 m2, with an accuracy of 0.1±0.01 mm. Jarvis model was modified to calculate the canopy resistance which was considered as the most sensitive variable in PM and SW models. In addition, we discussed the relationships between ET and environmental factors. The results showed that winter wheat ET increased gradually to 0.25 mm/h in the sowing and tillering stage, kept at a low level of about 0.20 mm/h in the winter period, and increased rapidly in the regreening and shooting period. The peak ET was 1.37 mm/h in April when the canopy was well developed. The PM model was suitable for calculating the ET in developed canopy cover, but the underestimate of the ET occurred in the beginning of the stage and the overestimate of the ET occurred in the end of the growing season. The analysis of modeling ET in sowing-tillering, tillering completion-regreen stage and jointing-filling stage indicated that the SW model performed well with a minimum stomatal resistance of 70 s/m, however, there was still large errors in milky stage. Lower soil water content occurred in the end of the growing season for winter wheat in Nanjing area, as a result the minimum stomatal resistance increased, which might be the direct reason that caused the obvious error in the ET simulation. Thus, we corrected the minimum stomatal resistance to a high value of 150 s/m for the Jarvis model in milky stage. The comparison between the ET from SW model and the measured ET by lysimeter in milky stage indicated that the modified SW was better than the unmodified SW model, for the modified and unmodified models, the slope was 1.12 and 3.57, the mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.05 and 0.18 mm/h and the agreement index was 0.62 and 0.33, respectively, in 2011-2012 and the MAE was 0.09 and 0.12 mm/h respectively in 2013-2014. The combined SW model obtained better results than each single model when evaluating the seasonal ET because of the optimized canopy resistance in different seasons. The modified SW model increased the determination coefficient (R2) to 0.87 and 0.67, decreased the MAE by 0.02 and 0.01 mm/h and apparently increased the agreement index to 0.82 and 0.70, respectively, in 2011-2012 and 2013-2014. The values of whole season ET were 408 and 453 mm using the modified SW model respectively during 2011-2012 and 2013-2014, and the ratio of soil evaporation to total ET was 28%. ET was mainly controlled by net radiation, vapor pressure deficit, and air temperature and the order of determination coefficient of the environmental factors was net radiation > vapor pressure deficit > air temperature. It was concluded that we could use a larger canopy resistance in SW model in milky stage in order to evaluate the ET during the whole season. The results can improve the evaluation precision of the ET throughout the whole season and be used as a reference for water management of winter wheat in Nanjing.
Keywords:evapotranspiration  models  crops  Nanjing area  winter wheat  Penman-Monteith model  Shuttleworth-Wallace model
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号