首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

长期定位双季稻田施用生物炭的温室气体减排生命周期评估
引用本文:张卫红,李玉娥,秦晓波,李健陵,万运帆,王斌,高清竹,刘硕.长期定位双季稻田施用生物炭的温室气体减排生命周期评估[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(20):132-140.
作者姓名:张卫红  李玉娥  秦晓波  李健陵  万运帆  王斌  高清竹  刘硕
作者单位:1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/农业部农业环境重点开放实验室,北京 100081; 2. 中国气象局气象干部培训学院河北分院,保定 071000;,1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/农业部农业环境重点开放实验室,北京 100081;,1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/农业部农业环境重点开放实验室,北京 100081;,1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/农业部农业环境重点开放实验室,北京 100081;,1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/农业部农业环境重点开放实验室,北京 100081;,1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/农业部农业环境重点开放实验室,北京 100081;,1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/农业部农业环境重点开放实验室,北京 100081;,1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/农业部农业环境重点开放实验室,北京 100081;
基金项目:农田草地生态系统减排计量与评估方法体系研究(2015BAC02B06);公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费(201103039)
摘    要:该文评估了双季稻田施用生物炭的温室气体排放和固碳及经济效益。采用生命周期(life cycle assessment,LCA)方法核算了生物炭原料收集与运输、生物炭生产、运输和撒播以及避免秸秆燃烧等过程中的温室气体排放和土壤碳储量;采用静态箱-气相色谱法监测了不同生物炭施入量在4 a 8个生育期的稻田CH4和N2O排放量;计算了不同生物炭施入量处理的净温室气体排放量和减排百分比。水稻生长季温室气体排放结果显示,CK处理(不添加生物炭)、BC1处理(5 t/hm2)、BC2处理(10 t/hm2)、BC3处理(20 t/hm2)的4 a田间温室气体排放总量分别为19.5、15.6、16.1、12.4 t/hm2,BC1、BC2和BC3处理相对CK处理的总减排百分比分别为19.70%、17.46%和36.40%。综合生物炭全生命周期各阶段温室气体排放,CK、BC1、BC2和BC3处理的4 a总净排放量分别为19.5、20.3、10.9、4.2 t/hm2,BC1处理的4a净排放相对CK处理增加4.3%,BC2和BC3处理的4 a净排放相对CK处理分别减少了44.0%、78.6%。3个生物炭用量中,生物炭施用量越低,经济效益越好。稻田施用生物炭能够降低其温室气体排放;全生命周期评估结果表明中量和高量生物炭能够起到减排效果,高量生物炭减排效果最好;经济效益分析结果表明随着生物炭施用量增加,经济效益降低。

关 键 词:温室气体  排放控制  生物炭  CH4  N2O  生命周期评价(LCA)  碳足迹
收稿时间:2018/3/26 0:00:00
修稿时间:2018/8/18 0:00:00

Estimation on GHG emission reduction in double cropping rice paddy with application of biochar in long-term period using LCA method
Zhang Weihong,Li Yu''e,Qin Xiaobo,Li Jianling,Wan Yunfan,Wang Bin,Gao Qingzhu and Liu Shuo.Estimation on GHG emission reduction in double cropping rice paddy with application of biochar in long-term period using LCA method[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2018,34(20):132-140.
Authors:Zhang Weihong  Li Yu'e  Qin Xiaobo  Li Jianling  Wan Yunfan  Wang Bin  Gao Qingzhu and Liu Shuo
Institution:1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/The Key Laboratory for Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;2.Hebei Sub-Center of CMATC, Baoding 071000, China;,1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/The Key Laboratory for Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;,1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/The Key Laboratory for Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;,1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/The Key Laboratory for Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;,1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/The Key Laboratory for Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;,1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/The Key Laboratory for Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;,1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/The Key Laboratory for Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China; and 1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/The Key Laboratory for Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China;
Abstract:Methane and N2O are two important greenhouse gases, which are the main emission in paddy ecology system. China is the highest rice planting country, so the greenhouse gas emission is huge in China. Application of biochar in paddy field can decrease the emissions of greenhouse gases. In this study, we investigated the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, carbon sequestration and economics of different rates of biochar application in a double rice cropping system. The experiment was carried out in rice variety area promotion experiment field in Huizhou of Guangdong from March 2012 to September 2015. Four treatments were designed as CK (famer traditional operation without biochar application), BC1 (biochar amendment at 5 t/hm2), BC2 (biochar amendment at 10 t/hm2), and BC3 (biochar amendment at 20 t/hm2), each treatment has 3 repeat. Biochar used in this study was obtained from wheat straw and produced by Henan Sanli New Energy Company. LCA (life cycle assessment) method was employed to calculate GHG emissions from the collection and transportation of raw materials, the production, transportation, and broadcasting of biochar, and from the avoidance of the straw burning and the soil carbon stocks. Static chamber-GC (gas chromatography) method was used to monitor the CH4 and N2O emissions under different rates of biochar application from 2012 to 2015. Then, the net GHG emissions and the percentage of emission reduction in the paddy field with different biochar amendment rates were calculated. The total GHG emissions from the double rice cropping system were 19.5, 15.6, 16.1, and 12.4 t/hm2 under CK, BC1, BC2, and BC3 treatments respectively in four years. Moreover, the total GHG emission reduction percentage of BC1, BC2 and BC3 were 19.70%, 17.46%, and 36.40%, respectively. Considering the GHG emissions of biochar in all stages of life cycle, the net GHG emissions of CK, BC1, BC2 and BC3 in the four years were 19.5, 20.3, 10.9, and 4.2 t/hm2, respectively, the treatment of BC1 increased the net emissions of 4.3% in the four years. BC2 and BC3 reduced the net GHG emissions by 44% and 78.6%, respectively in four years. The economic analysis indicated that the BC1treatment had more economic benefits compared to other treatments. The different biochar amendment rates significantly reduced the GHG emissions from the double rice cropping system, the highest application rate of biochar had the best emission reduction effect. The LCA of biochar application indicated that from medium to high application levels, biochar reduces emissions, for higher application rates of biochar, the effects are stronger. Moreover, the economic analysis indicated that the more amounts of biochar application, the least profitable to gain economic benefits.
Keywords:greenhouse gases  emission control  biochar  CH4  N2O  LCA  carbon footprint
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号