首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

典型荒漠植被根系对黏性岸坡侵蚀过程的影响
引用本文:宗全利,陈志康,蔡杭兵,秦鹏,刘春霞,金凯.典型荒漠植被根系对黏性岸坡侵蚀过程的影响[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(18):90-98.
作者姓名:宗全利  陈志康  蔡杭兵  秦鹏  刘春霞  金凯
作者单位:青岛农业大学资源与环境学院,青岛 266109;石河子大学水利建筑工程学院,石河子 832000;石河子大学水利建筑工程学院,石河子 832000;青岛农业大学资源与环境学院,青岛 266109
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51569029);青岛农业大学高层次人才科研基金(1119031)
摘    要:植被根系对岸坡侵蚀具有明显影响作用,为定量揭示植被根系对黏性岸坡侵蚀过程的网络作用、护挡作用和牵拉作用,开展红柳和胡杨典型植被根系的概化水槽试验。结果表明:1)在根系网络作用下,黏性岸坡固土能力显著提高,有植被根系比无植被提高了30%~56%,其中红柳根系比胡杨根系平均提高了24.2%;2)不同布置方式的固土效果差异较大,红柳和胡杨根系固土效应V型布置比竖直布置分别提高了27.1%和18.6%;3)根系护挡作用对坡脚保护作用显著,有植被岸坡近岸纵向时均流速和紊动能分别减小至无植被的45%~67%和75%~91%;4)根系牵拉作用主要表现在对岸坡崩塌根土黏结体的堆积和分解以及床面淤积的影响等,其中牵拉作用越强,崩塌堆积体的体积占比就越大,根土黏结体被分解时间也越长,试验结果得到根系牵拉作用对河床保护贡献值平均提高了20%。研究结果可为干旱区荒漠植被固土护堤作用机理提供技术支持和理论参考。

关 键 词:侵蚀  根系  红柳  胡杨  黏性岸坡  网络作用  护挡作用  牵拉作用
收稿时间:2020/7/3 0:00:00
修稿时间:2020/9/8 0:00:00

Effects of typical desert vegetation roots on the erosion process of cohesive riverbank
Zong Quanli,Chen Zhikang,Cai Hangbing,Qin Peng,Liu Chunxi,Jin Kai.Effects of typical desert vegetation roots on the erosion process of cohesive riverbank[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2020,36(18):90-98.
Authors:Zong Quanli  Chen Zhikang  Cai Hangbing  Qin Peng  Liu Chunxi  Jin Kai
Institution:1.College of Resources and Environment, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China; 2. College of Water Conservancy and Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China;2.College of Water Conservancy and Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
Abstract:Abstract: Desert vegetation roots of various species can contribute to the soil shear strength, and thereby to effectively stabilize the riverbank slope, particularly in the Tarim River Basin with the serious soil erosion. Tamarix ramosissima (TR) and Populus euphratica (PE) are the dominant plant species in typical shrubs and trees, respectively, where both have significant positive effects on the riverbank erosion. In this study, taking the vegetation roots of TR and PE in the Tarim River Basin as the study objects, the influence of desert vegetation roots on the erosion process of cohesive riverbank was investigated systematically via a generalized laboratory experiment. In the experimental design, the roots were mainly arranged in two forms of vertical and V-shaped with the angles of 90° and 60°, respectively. Subsequently, the roots were equally spaced along the section with an average spacing of 4cm. The results showed that: (1) the capacity of soil consolidation in the cohesive riverbank was significantly improved under the action of the roots network. Specifically, the erosion resistance of riverbank with roots increased by 30% to 56%, compared with that without roots. The roots of TR increased by 19.6% for the vertical layout, and 28.1% for the V-shaped, compared with that of PE, indicating that the capacity of soil consolidation varied in types of roots. The roots of TR and PE for the V-shaped increased by 27.1% and 18.6%, respectively, compared with that for the vertical layout, indicating that the capacity of soil consolidation varied in the layout methods of roots. Generally, the effect of roots network of TR increased by 24.2% on average, compared with that of PE. (2) There was a significant protection of roots retaining effect on the riverbank, mainly aiming to change the near-shore flow field, and protect the bank toe. The experiment results show that the vertical average velocity and turbulent energy of flow near the riverbank with roots were reduced to 45~ 67% and 75~91%, respectively, compared with that without roots. (3) The roots pulling effect was mainly explored by the impact on the accumulation and decomposition of the collapsed root-soil blocks and the deposition in riverbed. Consequently, the experimental results demonstrated that the roots pulling effect can be much stronger, as the increase in the volume of collapsed block accumulation. Specifically, the TR root with the average value of accumulation, 0.33, has more collapsed blocks than that of PE with the value of 0.24, indicating that the adhesion strength of root-soil blocks for the TR was stronger than that of PE. Furthermore, the roots pulling effect can be enhanced, as the increase in the time for further decomposition of the root-soil blocks. Two relationships of exponential functions were also obtained between the volume of collapsed blocks and scouring time for the TR and PE roots. The decomposed rate of root-soil blocks for the TR was lower than that for PE, whereas, the pulling effect of TR was greater than that of PE. In addition, the roots length density was positively correlated with the cumulative deposition rate of the riverbed, reflecting the interpenetration and winding ability of the roots. The contribution value of roots pulling effect to riverbed protection increased by about 20%, according to the cumulative deposition rate. These data can be used to reveal the effects of different vegetation roots on the erosion processes of cohesive riverbank, including the network, retaining and pulling effects. As such, this findings can also provide a sound technical support to the soil reinforcement and riverbank protection by the vegetation roots in arid desert areas.
Keywords:erosion  roots  Tamarix ramosissima  Populus euphratica  cohesive riverbank  network effect  retaining effect  pulling effect
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号