首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同土质工程堆积体径流产沙差异
引用本文:李建明,牛俊,王文龙,张平仓,程冬兵,王一峰,张冠华,郭明明.不同土质工程堆积体径流产沙差异[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):187-194.
作者姓名:李建明  牛俊  王文龙  张平仓  程冬兵  王一峰  张冠华  郭明明
作者单位:1. 长江科学院水土保持研究所,武汉,430010;2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,杨凌 712100; 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,杨凌 712100;3. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,杨凌,712100
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(40771127、51309154、41301298);水利部公益性行业专项(201201048、201201047);中国科学院知识创新工程重大项目(KZZD-EW-04-03)
摘    要:依据野外调查结果概化堆积体下垫面,采用室内人工模拟降雨方法,研究不同雨强(1.0、1.5、2.0、2.5 mm/min)条件下4种砾石质量分数(0、10%、20%、30%)的壤土、黏土及砂土工程堆积体径流产沙特征差异。结果表明:1)砂土堆积体坡面产流开始所需时间较壤土及黏土堆积体长。3种土壤质地工程堆积体含砾石的平均流速较纯土体(砾石质量分数为0)小,大小表现为黏土壤土砂土。砂土堆积体平均径流率较壤土和黏土分别减少20.7%和18.8%;2)砂土堆积体平均侵蚀速率分别是壤土和黏土的3.0和2.3倍。3种土壤质地工程堆积体的平均侵蚀速率随雨强增大递增,但随砾石质量分数递增呈显著线性递减(P0.05);3)砂土堆积体平均侵蚀量分别是壤土和黏土的4.5和3.4倍。3种土壤质地工程堆积体的侵蚀量与径流量和雨强均显著相关。研究成果可为建立生产建设项目工程堆积体水土流失量测算模型提供数据基础和理论依据。

关 键 词:径流  砾石  侵蚀  工程堆积体  产沙  人工模拟降雨  土壤质地
收稿时间:2015/11/4 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/4/10 0:00:00

Differences in characteristics of runoff and sediment yielding from engineering accumulations with different soil textures
Li Jianming,Niu Jun,Wang Wenlong,Zhang Pingcang,Cheng Dongbing,Wang Yifeng,Zhang Guanhua and Guo Mingming.Differences in characteristics of runoff and sediment yielding from engineering accumulations with different soil textures[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2016,32(14):187-194.
Authors:Li Jianming  Niu Jun  Wang Wenlong  Zhang Pingcang  Cheng Dongbing  Wang Yifeng  Zhang Guanhua and Guo Mingming
Institution:1. Soil and Water Conservation Department, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China,1. Soil and Water Conservation Department, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China,2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Agriculture on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; 3. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China,1. Soil and Water Conservation Department, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China,1. Soil and Water Conservation Department, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China,1. Soil and Water Conservation Department, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China,1. Soil and Water Conservation Department, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China and 2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Agriculture on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
Abstract:Abstract: It is a hot and difficult issue to study soil and water loss caused by current engineering accumulations in production and construction projects characterized by complex material composition and steep slope. This study experimentally investigated the erosion differences in engineering accumulations with three soil textures. Based on field survey, a laboratory experiment of engineering accumulation underlying surfaces, representing the Northern Shaanxi sand, Central Shaanxi Plain loam, and Jiangxi clay area, was conducted under simulated rainfall condition. Effects of rainfall intensity and gravels content on runoff and sediment yielding and erosion were investigated. The engineering accumulation plot was 5 m×1 m with a slope of 25°. Rainfall intensities were 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mm/min and mass fractions of gravels were 0, 10%, 20% and 30%, respectively. Soil texture was clay, sand and loam. Runoff generation time, runoff velocity, runoff rate and erosion rate were determined. Each experiment was controlled within 45 min from the initiation of runoff to the end. Sediment concentration was calculated by traditional oven-drying method. Totally, 48 simulated rainfall events were examined in this study. Results showed that runoff generation was earlier in the loam and clay accumulations than in the sandy accumulation. Under the same experimental conditions, the averaged runoff velocity for the accumulations with gravels decreased from 8.3% to 27.3% in comparison with the pure accumulation, in the decreasing order of clay, loam and sandy accumulations. The averaged runoff velocity was significantly correlated with rainfall intensity for the 3 accumulations. Averaged runoff rate on the sandy accumulation was 20.7% and 18.8% lower than the loam and clay accumulations, respectively. The averaged runoff rate increased from 42.9% to 253.4% as rainfall intensity increased from 1.5 to 2.5 mm/min. Averaged runoff rate had a high correlation with rainfall intensity (P<0.01). The average erosion rate of the sandy accumulation was 3.0 times that of the loam accumulation and 2.3 times that of the clay accumulation. The averaged erosion rates for the 3 accumulations increased from 153.1% to 1219.9% while rainfall intensity increased from 1.0 to 2.5 mm/min. However, there was a significantly negative linear relationship between averaged erosion rate and gravel content (P<0.05). As rainfall intensity increased from 1.0 to 2.5 mm/min, runoff volume increased from 42.2% to 253.2% and erosion amount increased from 178.9% to 1589.1%. Averaged erosion amount of the sandy accumulation was 4.5 times that of the loam accumulation and 3.4 times that of the clay accumulation. For the 3 accumulations, erosion amount was significantly correlated with runoff volume and rainfall intensity. Results from our study may provide important data for establishing a model of soil and water loss from engineering accumulations in production and construction projects.
Keywords:runoff  gravel  erosion  engineering accumulation  sediment yielding  simulated rainfall  soil texture
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号