首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

科学耕作与留茬改良小麦-玉米两熟农田土壤物理性状及增产效果
引用本文:赵红香,迟淑筠,宁堂原,田慎重,王丙文,李增嘉.科学耕作与留茬改良小麦-玉米两熟农田土壤物理性状及增产效果[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(9):113-122.
作者姓名:赵红香  迟淑筠  宁堂原  田慎重  王丙文  李增嘉
作者单位:山东农业大学农学院,作物生物学国家重点实验室,土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室,泰安 271018
基金项目:十二五国家科技支撑项目(2012BAD14B07、2011BAD21B06);公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费资助(201103001);国家自然科学基金(30900876、31101127);山东省农业重大应用技术创新课题共同资助。
摘    要:为了探讨不同覆盖耕作方式对农田土壤物理性状及作物产量的影响,该试验研究了免耕、常规2种耕作方式和4种留茬高度的玉米秸秆还田处理,对麦-玉两熟农田土壤含水率、容重、孔隙度以及作物产量的影响。结果表明:在0~40cm土层内,秸秆还田的集雨和保水效果显著,免耕留茬0.5m还田处理的含水率比免耕无覆盖处理增加了15.95%。秸秆还田量对0~40cm内土壤贮水量的影响不同。耕作措施显著影响了土壤容重,小麦播种前常规留茬1m还田、常规全量还田处理容重低至1.0g/cm3左右。秸秆还田能增加土壤总孔隙度、降低毛管与非毛管孔隙度的比值。单一免耕处理降低了作物产量,而免耕覆盖能增产,其留茬1m还田处理比无还田处理增产22.44%,比常规留茬0.5m还田处理高3.64%。因此,免耕留茬1m还田处理在改善农田土壤物理性状和增加作物产量方面显著,该研究可为农田管理过程中耕作措施和秸秆还田量的选择提供参考依据。

关 键 词:土壤  土壤含水率  物理性状  耕作措施  秸秆还田量  土壤容重  土壤孔隙度  作物产量
收稿时间:2012/11/20 0:00:00
修稿时间:3013/4/28 0:00:00

Covering farming pattern to improve soil physical properties and crop yield in wheat-maize cropping system
Zhao Hongxiang,Chi Shuyun,Ning Tangyuan,Tian Shenzhong,Wang Bingwen and Li Zengjia.Covering farming pattern to improve soil physical properties and crop yield in wheat-maize cropping system[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2013,29(9):113-122.
Authors:Zhao Hongxiang  Chi Shuyun  Ning Tangyuan  Tian Shenzhong  Wang Bingwen and Li Zengjia
Institution:(Agronomy College of Shandong Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, Tai′an 271018, China)
Abstract:Soil physical properties and crop productivity are general affected by different management methods of farmland, such as different tillage systems and crop straw managements. The objective of this study were to measure physical properties of soil including soil water content, soil water storage, soil bulk density and soil porosity (capillary porosity and non-capillary porosity) under a long-term tillage and straw management experiment system in the North China Plain, and the crop productivity of a wheat-maize cropping system was also analyzed (2010-2012). The study was assessed on 10 year field study with a split-plot design, which involved two tillage methods of conventional tillage (C) and zero tillage (Z) and four levels of straw utilization systems at straw returning (P), stubble returning of 1m height (-1), stubble returning of 0.5 m height (-0.5) and straw removal (A). The innovation of this study investigated effects of 4 different stubble heights returning on soil physical properties and crop yields. The result showed that, the soil water content in the 0-40 cm soil layer under treatments of conventional tillage and zero tillage increased with the amounts of straw returning increasing, so straw returning could increase the soil water content, Z-0.5 was more than 15.95% to AZ. In comparison to the conventional tillage, no tillage method combination with straw could improve the soil moisture, so zero tillage could improve the soil water content. In 0-40 cm soil layer, amounts of straw returning affected variation of soil water storage in the two stages, in the planting stage of wheat, soil water storage under treatments of conventional tillage and zero tillage gradually reduced with the amounts of straw returning increasing, but in the maturating stage of wheat, soil water storage under treatments of conventional tillage and zero tillage gradually increased with the amounts of straw returning increasing. In the planting stage of wheat, tillage methods could significantly affected soil bulk density, the treatment of stubble 1 meter returning had the lower soil bulk density (p<0.05). However, soil bulk density could self-increasing with the times, eventually there was no significant difference of soil bulk density under treatments of conventional tillage and zero tillage in the maturating stage of wheat. Straw returning also increased the soil porosity, reduced the ratio of capillary porosity and non-capillary porosity in the planting stage of wheat. Zero tillage treatment without straw returning reduced wheat and maize yields, but the zero tillage method combination with straw could increase total yields of wheat and maize, and the best treatment to increase yields was 1 m stubble returning treatment, it increased 22.44% than zero tillage without straw returning. Therefore, the treatment of stubble 1 m returning had conducive to improve soil physical properties and crop productivity.
Keywords:soil  soil moisture  physical properties  tillage methods  amounts of straw returning  soil bulk density  soil porosity  crop yield
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号