首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

噻呋酰胺不同种子处理方式对水稻纹枯病的控制效应及其安全性评价
引用本文:姚克兵,于居龙,张国,赵来成,缪康,束兆林,杨红福,徐超,朱凤.噻呋酰胺不同种子处理方式对水稻纹枯病的控制效应及其安全性评价[J].农学学报,2021,11(7):13-17.
作者姓名:姚克兵  于居龙  张国  赵来成  缪康  束兆林  杨红福  徐超  朱凤
作者单位:1.江苏丘陵地区镇江农业科学研究所,江苏句容 212400;2.江苏省植物保护植物检疫站,南京 210036
基金项目:江苏省重点研发计划(现代农业)项目“稻麦农药化肥减施增效技术集成创新与示范”(BE2017366);江苏省现代农业(稻麦)产业技术体系项目(JATS(2019)269);江苏省农业科技自主创新基金“基于种子处理的水稻主要病害简约化防控技术研究”(CX(2017)3023)
摘    要:为明确噻呋酰胺种子处理对水稻纹枯病的防治效果及对水稻生长的影响,同时为其推广应用提供科学依据,以24%噻呋酰胺悬浮剂为试验材料,采用浸种、湿拌和干拌3种种子处理方式,每种方式设置150、300、450、600 ai.g/hm2和CK 5个处理,测定其对水稻纹枯病的控制效果及对水稻种子的安全性。结果表明,播种后91天,24%噻呋酰胺悬浮剂150~600 ai.g/hm2湿拌处理对纹枯病的控制效果为90.46%~98.10%;干拌处理对纹枯病的控制效果为91.16%~99.28%;浸种处理对纹枯病的控制效果不理想。播种后108天,各处理对水稻纹枯病的防治效果略有下降,但与播种后91天对纹枯病的防治效果趋势基本一致,且各处理对水稻发芽、出苗和生长无不良影响。因此,24%噻呋酰胺悬浮剂种子处理宜湿拌和干拌,此外,从防治效果和经济角度考虑,推荐浓度为300~450 ai.g/hm2,其对水稻纹枯病具有良好的防治效果,并表现出较长的持效期,同时对水稻生长安全,可在水稻生产上推广应用。

关 键 词:水稻纹枯病  噻呋酰胺  种子处理  防治效果  安全性  
收稿时间:2020-03-04

Rice Sheath Blight: Control Effect and Safety Evaluation Under Different Thifluzamide Seed Treatments
Yao Kebing,Yu Julong,Zhang Guo,Zhao Laicheng,Miao Kang,Shu Zhaolin,Yang Hongfu,Xu Chao,Zhu Feng.Rice Sheath Blight: Control Effect and Safety Evaluation Under Different Thifluzamide Seed Treatments[J].Journal of Agriculture,2021,11(7):13-17.
Authors:Yao Kebing  Yu Julong  Zhang Guo  Zhao Laicheng  Miao Kang  Shu Zhaolin  Yang Hongfu  Xu Chao  Zhu Feng
Institution:1.Zhenjiang Institute of Agricultural Science in Hilly Area of Jiangsu Province, Jurong 212400, Jiangsu, China;2.Plant Protection and Quarantine Station of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, 210036, Jiangsu, China
Abstract:To clarify the control effect of thiofuramide seed treatment on rice sheath blight and its impact on rice growth, and provide a basis for its popularization and application, 24% thiofuramide SC was used as the experimental material, and three seed treatment methods, including seed soaking, wet mixing and dry mixing were conducted, and each method was set with five treatments of 150, 300, 450, 600 ai.g/hm2 and CK, to determine the control effect on rice sheath blight and safety on rice seed. The results showed that the control effect on sheath blight by wet mixing was 90.46%-98.10% when seeds were treated with 24% thifluzamide 150-600 ai.g/hm2 after 91 days. The control effect on sheath blight by dry mix treatment was 91.16%-99.28%. The control effect on sheath blight was poor when seeds were treated by soaking. The effect of each treatment on rice sheath blight slightly decreased after 108 days, but the trend was basically the same as 91 days after sowing. At the same time, all treatments had no adverse effect on rice germination, emergence and growth. Therefore, rice seed treatment with 24% thifluzamide SC should be used by wet mixing or dry mixing. In addition, from the perspective of control effect and economic cost, the recommended concentration should be 300-450 ai.g/hm2, which has a good control effect on rice sheath blight and a long efficacy, and is safe for rice growth.
Keywords:Rice Sheath Blight  Thifluzamide  Seed Treatment  Control Effect  Safety Evaluation  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号