| 探管诱集与取样筛检两种方法检测储粮害虫数量比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨自力,蒋天科,李伟,熊泽斌,严晓平,周浩,张娟,马鑫.探管诱集与取样筛检两种方法检测储粮害虫数量比较[J].粮食储藏,2007,36(3):16-19. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨自力 蒋天科 李伟 熊泽斌 严晓平 周浩 张娟 马鑫 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 重庆市铜梁国家粮食储备库,402560
2. 国家粮食局成都粮食储藏科学研究所,610031 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 初步研究比较了XS-C1型粮仓害虫仓外采集检测系统(探管诱集)与取样筛检两种不同害虫数量检测方法储粮害虫的种群密度.结果表明,两种检测方法对谷蠹、锯谷盗和扁谷盗三类害虫的检测结果很接近,也与真实值很接近;对米象和赤拟谷盗两类害虫,两种检测方法的检测结果相差较大,需校正后确定.它可为估计粮堆内储粮害虫的真实数量及其动态提供参考依据.
|
| 关 键 词： | XS-C1型粮仓害虫仓外采集检测系统 取样筛检 储粮害虫 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-03-20 |
COMPARISON OF PROBE- TUBE TRAPS AND SAMPLING INSPECTION TO DETECT STORED GRAIN PESTS |
| |
| Yang Zili,Jiang Tianke,Li Wei,Xiong Zebin,Yan Xiaoping,Zhou Hao,Zhang Juan,Ma Xin.COMPARISON OF PROBE- TUBE TRAPS AND SAMPLING INSPECTION TO DETECT STORED GRAIN PESTS[J].Grain Storage,2007,36(3):16-19. |
| |
| Authors: | Yang Zili Jiang Tianke Li Wei Xiong Zebin Yan Xiaoping Zhou Hao Zhang Juan Ma Xin |
| |
| Institution: | 1.Tongliang-Stage-Grain Storage, Chongqing 402560;2.Chengdu Grain Storage Research institute, State Administration of Grain Reserves 610031 |
| |
| Abstract: | Two different pests detection methods:(a)XS-C1 type grain pests detection system(probe tube attractive traps),(b)sampling inspection are primarily studied and compared.Results showed that the two methods have similar results for Australian wheat weevil,saw-toothed grain beetle and grain beetle,and the results are quite near to reality;while two methods have obvious different results for rice weevil and red flour beetle,they need to be confirmed after emendation.All results could provide reference to estimate real amount of stored grain pests' and their development. |
| |
| Keywords: | probe-tube traps sampling detection stored-grain insect |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
