Promoting self-determination,minimizing green gentrification,and maximizing community benefits in urban forestry expansion: A systematic review |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. University of Southern California, Spatial Sciences Institute, United States;2. University of Southern California, School of Architecture, United States;1. Cartography & GIS Research Group, Department of Geography, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Ixelles, Belgium;2. Cosmopolis Centre for Urban Research, Department of Geography, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Ixelles, Belgium;3. Building, Architecture, & Town Planning (BATir) Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Ixelles, Belgium;1. Department of phytology, FSAA., 2425 rue de l’Agriculture, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada;2. Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, Department of Biology, McGill University, Stewart Biology Building, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada;3. Institut de recherche en biologie végétale, Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, 4101 Sherbrooke E., Montréal, QC H1X 2B2, Canada;4. Jardin botanique de Montréal, 4101 Sherbrooke E., Montréal, QC H1X 2B2, Canada;1. College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;2. Institute for Geosciences and Geography, Department of Sustainable Landscape, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), 06120, Germany;3. Shandong Tudi Rural Revitalization Group Co.,Lt, Jinan 250000, China;1. Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, 2325 N. Clifton Ave., Chicago, IL 60614, USA;2. Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN, USA;3. Environmental Sciences Program, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA;4. Negaunee Institute for Plant Conservation Science and Action, Chicago Botanic Garden, Glencoe, IL, USA;5. Urban Wildlife Institute, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, IL, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate how urban forest expansion processes can most equitably be carried out to improve environmental conditions in U.S. cities. In hopes of informing future environmental planning efforts that center racial and socioeconomic justice, this study examines existing literature in two ways. First, this study gathers existing research looking at associations between urban forest coverage and indicators of gentrification and residential displacement to better understand eco-gentrification risks. Second, this study assesses how participatory planning has been carried out in urban forest expansion projects and compiles descriptive findings and best practices noted in the literature. Findings show a need for further research looking specifically at associations between urban forest expansion and diverse indicators of gentrification and residential displacement, such as demographic shifts in neighborhood populations over time, and temporal changes in rental prices depending on a neighborhood’s proximity to different forms and magnitudes of urban forest expansion. Publications related to participatory urban forestry planning point to the importance of: (a) prioritizing the needs and goals of community members to best utilize local knowledge, rebuild trust in government, and repair historic harm; and (b) creating opportunities for community members to participate in planning processes that are accessible logistically, economically, and socially. |
| |
| Keywords: | Urban forestry Ecosystem services Environmental justice Eco-gentrification Participatory urban planning |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
