基于区位商分析法的我国农业产业结构调整区域差异研究 |
| |
引用本文: | 闫建伟.基于区位商分析法的我国农业产业结构调整区域差异研究[J].南方农业学报,2016(10):1795-1800. |
| |
作者姓名: | 闫建伟 |
| |
作者单位: | 周口师范学院 周口发展研究中心,河南 周口,466000 |
| |
基金项目: | 国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AGL004);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2016BJJ012);河南省周口师范学院周口发展研究中心横向项目(ZS201606001) |
| |
摘 要: | 【目的】研究劳动力转移背景下我国农业产业结构调整的区域差异情况,为政府农业产业结构调整政策的制定提供参考依据。【方法】利用区位商统计分析法对1998~2013年我国31个省(区、市)农业产业结构调整的区域差异进行实证研究,并进行区域类型划分。【结果】(1)通过农业产业结构调整,我国农林牧副渔结构不断优化升级;(2)我国各地区农业产业结构调整有明显差异,主要体现为优势区域数量的变化、调整幅度的大小、调整的方向及调整的重点;(3)我国农业产业结构调整可划分为四大类型,即A(正向调整、高区位商)、B(负向调整、高区位商)、C(正向调整、低区位商)、D(负向调整、低区位商),各地区产业结构调整目标已实现,但仍有少部分地区产业调整效果不理想。【建议】地方政府要认清各自的农业产业优势,因地制宜、扬长避短,A类可加强科技创新,推动、引领产业升级;B类可加大资金投入,提高规模化水平,巩固产业发展;C类可发掘优势资源,大力发展特色农业;D类可充分利用区外市场,提高区域间贸易服务水平或适时转移产业支持重点。
|
关 键 词: | 农业产业结构 种植业 林业 牧业 渔业 区域差异 区位商分析法 |
Regional differences of agricultural industrial restructuring based on location quotient analysis |
| |
Abstract: | Objective]Regional differences of agricultural industrial structure adjustment under the background of labor transfer was studies in order to provide reference for government in drawing up agricultural industrial restructuring policies.Method]Using location quotient analysis, an empirical analysis on regional differences in agricultural industry restructur-ing of 31 provinces(regions or cities) during 1998-2013 was conducted. Result](1)Through the adjustment of agricultur-al industrial structure , agriculture-forestry-animal husbandry-fishery structure upgraded continuously . ( 2 ) There were large differences in agricultural industrial structure adjustment in different regions in China , which was indicated through variation of superior areas, adjustment extent, adjustment orientation and adjustment highlights. (3)The adjustment could be divided into four types: A(positive adjustment, high location quotient), B(negative adjustment, high location quo-tient), C(positive adjustment, low location quotient) and D(negative adjustment, low location quotient). Targets of in-dustrial restructuring in most parts have been achieved. Industrial restructuring in a few areas did not realized the expected targets. Suggestion]Local government should recognize the advantages in agricultural industry , adjust measures according to local conditions, showcase the strengths and avoid the weaknesses. Type A should strengthen scientific and technologi-cal innovation, promote and guide industrial upgrading; type B should increase capital investment, expand the scale and strengthen industrial development; type C should develop the characteristic agriculture by utilizing resources; type D should make full use of market outside the region , improve trade and service level and transfer supporting industries in proper timing. |
| |
Keywords: | agricultural industrial structure planting forestry animal husbandry fishery regional difference lo-cation quotient analysis |
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|