A Comparison of Elevated Blood Parameter Values in a Population of Thoroughbred Racehorses

In racing Thoroughbred horses, blood cell counts and key biochemistry parameters are used to monitor horse health during training. The most common measure is total white blood cell (WBC) count, usually coupled with estimates of the relative abundance of the five main types of WBC. However, WBC can go down and up when challenged, making interpretation difficult. In contrast, a large majority of health issues that impact training should trigger an inflammatory response. In this study, we test the potential for two inflammatory biomarkers, fibrinogen and serum amyloid A (SAA), to provide more reliable indicators of health issues across a large sample of horses in training. We find that although WBC and other cell counts are generally correlated with each other and other biochemistry parameters across their full range of values, fibrinogen and SAA exhibit the greatest concordance among the top 15% of values. Moreover, horses with the top WBC values do not overlap significantly with those having the top fibrinogen and SAA values. Because most horses are healthy, these patterns suggest that natural variation in cell counts and biochemistry largely occlude values that might indicate health issues. In contrast, the subset of unusual horses with elevated levels of both fibrinogen and SAA are strongly suggestive of the expected handful of animals with minor, undetected issues. We conclude that fibrinogen and SAA have excellent potential as biomarkers and are likely to be more informative about conditions relevant to horses in training compared with the widely used WBC.