首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

青崖寨自然保护区农户生态补偿意愿与生计资本研究
引用本文:王耀,李良涛,梁世杰,张晓华,周月康,马传宇.青崖寨自然保护区农户生态补偿意愿与生计资本研究[J].中国农学通报,2022,38(2):157-164.
作者姓名:王耀  李良涛  梁世杰  张晓华  周月康  马传宇
作者单位:1.河北工程大学园林与生态工程学院,河北邯郸 056038;2.邯郸学院,河北邯郸 056005;3.河北武安青崖寨国家级自然保护区管委会,河北武安 056300
基金项目:河北省农业创新驿站项目“河北绿坤中药材基地创建”(2020023);河北省林业和草原科学技术研究项目“太行山特有珍稀濒危植物缘毛太行花引种驯化及其保护繁育研究”(2001019);邯郸市科技技术研究与发展计划项目“邯郸市采矿迹地生态植被重建与土壤改良技术研究”(1727201065);武安青崖寨国家级自然保护区建设项目“野生动植物及森林生态系统本底调查及重点保护对象培育繁殖”(20180702)
摘    要:为缓解生态保护与当地可持续发展的矛盾,本文以河北省青崖寨自然保护区为例,采用调查问卷和条件价值评估法,研究分析当地农户生态补偿意愿与生计资本。结果表明,保护区农户平均生态补偿意愿期望值为4148元/hm2,农户需求的主要补偿方式为现金补偿,其次为政策补偿和实物补偿,技术补偿需求度最低。农户政策补偿需求最高的两项分别为惠农政策、完善社会保障制度;实物补偿中,农户对粮食和有机化肥、环保农药的需求分别位于第一、第二位;在技术补偿方面,对果木蔬菜种植技术、农业种植和农产品加工技术需求度高。保护区自然资本为0.1812,人力资本为0.4431,物质资本为0.1638,金融资本为0.4165,社会资本为0.2998。生计资本总体发展不平衡,呈现脆弱性,且不同受偿意愿农户的生计资本呈现差异性。本研究为当地制定生态补偿政策,构建当地自然保护区生态补偿机制提供一定参考。

关 键 词:补偿机制  条件价值评估法  补偿意愿  补偿方式  生计资本  
收稿时间:2021-02-10

Farmers’ Ecological Compensation Willingness and Livelihood Capital in Qingyazhai Nature Reserve
WANG Yao,LI Liangtao,LIANG Shijie,ZHANG Xiaohua,ZHOU Yuekang,MA Chuanyu.Farmers’ Ecological Compensation Willingness and Livelihood Capital in Qingyazhai Nature Reserve[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2022,38(2):157-164.
Authors:WANG Yao  LI Liangtao  LIANG Shijie  ZHANG Xiaohua  ZHOU Yuekang  MA Chuanyu
Institution:1.College of Landscape and Ecological Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei 056038;2.Handan University, Handan, Hebei 056005;3.Management Committee of Wuan Qingyazhai National Nature Reserve in Hebei, Wuan, Hebei 056300
Abstract:To alleviate the contradiction between ecological protection and local sustainable development, this paper took the Qingyazhai Nature Reserve in Hebei Province as an example, used questionnaires and conditional value assessment method to analyze the willingness of local farmers to accept ecological compensation and their livelihood capital. The results showed that the average expected value of ecological compensation willingness of farmers in the reserve was 4148 yuan/hm2. The main form of compensation for farmers was cash compensation, followed by policy compensation and in-kind compensation, with the lowest demand on technical compensation. The highest compensation demands by farmers were preferential policies for farmers and the improvement of the social security system. Among the in-kind compensation, farmers’ demand for grain and organic fertilizers ranked the first, and the demand for environmental pesticides ranked the second. In terms of technical compensation, there was a high demand for fruit and vegetable planting technology, agricultural planting technology and agricultural product processing technology. The natural capital of the reserve was 0.1812, the human capital was 0.4431, the physical capital was 0.1638, the financial capital was 0.4165, and the social capital was 0.2998. The overall development of livelihood capital was unbalanced, showing vulnerability, and the livelihood capital of farmers with different compensation willingness was different. This research is of significance for the formulation of ecological compensation policies in the study area and the construction of reasonable ecological compensation mechanisms.
Keywords:compensation mechanism  conditional value assessment method  willingness to accept compensation  compensation method  livelihood capital  
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号