Field measurement of carbon dioxide evolution from soil by a flow-through chamber method using a portable photosynthesis meter

Extract

Since a rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentration is expected to lead to global warming, it is important to quantify the global carbon circulation. The CO₂ evolution rate from soil has usually been measured by one of three methods: 1) CO₂ absorption (Anderson 1982), where the evolved CO₂ is absorbed in an alkali solution and the content subsequently determined, 2) closed chamber (Rolston 1986) in which the CO₂ evolution rate is calculated from the increase of the CO₂ concentration in a closed chamber covering the soil surface, and 3) flow-through chamber (Rolston 1986) in which a fixed rate of ambient air is pumped through an open chamber and the difference in the. CO₂ concentration between the inlet and the outlet is measured. Although the CO₂ absorption method is very simple in terms of apparatus and procedure, the determined CO₂ evolution rate tends to be underestimated in cases where the evolved CO₂ is not fully absorbed in the alkali solution (Ewel et al. 1987; Sakamoto and Yoshida 1988), or overestimated in cases where the CO₂ concentration in the chamber is too low to stimulate microbial activity (Koizumi et al. 1991; Nakadai et al. 1993), In the closed chamber method, when the gas concentration in the chamber is higher than that of the ambient air, gas diffusion from the soil to the atmosphere is restricted (Denmead 1978). At this point, the flow-through chamber method seems to be most suitable for measuring the CO₂ evolution rate, because the rate is determined under nearly natural conditions. However, this method has a disadvantage in that the apparatus is composed of an infra-red CO₂ analyzer, air pumps, mass flow meters, a recorder, and other items, which are too large, heavy, and complex to use in the field (Freijer and Bouten 1991). Hence, in spite of the above limitations, most of the studies on CO₂ evolution in situ have been carried out using the CO₂ absorption method (Kowalenko et al. 1978; Seto et al. 1978a, b; Ewel et al 1981, 1987; Gupta and Singh 1981; Reinke et al. 1981; Edwards and Ros-Todd 1983; Grahammer et al. 1991) or the closed chamber method (Naganawa et al. 1989; Mariko et al. 1994). The flow-through chamber method has been used only at sites where electric power supply and other types of equipment were available (Mathes and Schriefer 1985; Ewel et al. 1987; Nakadai et al. 1993). In the present report a flow-through chamber method using a portable CO₂ analyzer system was examined, for the determination of CO₂ evolution from soil without an electric power supply or other special equipment.