Sprout development and processing quality changes in potato tubers stored under ethylene: 1. Effects of ethylene concentration

Ethylene effectively inhibits sprouting of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) during storage, but it often darkens fry color. The objective of the work described here was to determine if altering the concentration of ethylene applied would reduce the darkening while retaining adequate sprout inhibition. Trials were conducted over three consecutive years (1991–1992, 1992–1993, and 1993–1994). Tubers of cv Russet Burbank (ca 150–300 g) were stored at 9 C for 25 wk in closed chambers in a refrigerated room under continuous exposure to 0.4, 4, 40, or 400 µL L^?1 ethylene gas delivered with the ventilation airstream (ca 0.5 air exchanges per h, for 6 h each day). Untreated control and chlorpropham-treated (CIPC) check tubers were stored under the same conditions but without ethylene supplementation. Sprout number, length, and biomass, fry color, loss of tuber mass, disease, and dry matter content were evaluated at 5-wk intervals. Dose-dependent effects (400>40>4>0.4 µL L^?1) of ethylene on sprout growth and fry color were observed. The 400, 40, and 4 µL L^?1 ethylene treatments inhibited sprout growth as effectively as CIPC, whereas in 0.4 µL L^?1 ethylene sprouting was midway between CIPC and the untreated control. Sprout mass and maximum sprout length in all ethylene treatments were significantly lower (P<0.05) than in the untreated control. Compared with the initial value (57.3 Agtron reflectance units ARu]), after 5 wk of storage fry color was up to 5 ARu darker in the ethylene treatments, but recovered steadily at the subsequent evaluation dates. At 25 wk of storage the fry color of tubers from the 40 and 4 µL L^?1 ethylene treatments were, however, still darker than tubers stored with CIPC. Inhibition of sprout growth was slightly more effective in the 400 and 40 µL L^?1 ethylene treatments than in 4 µL L^?1, although there were no significant differences (P<0.01) in fry color between these treatments. In comparison with the other ethylene treatments, fry color in 0.4 µL L^?1 ethylene was lighter, but inhibition of sprout growth was significantly (P<0.05) poorer. There were no differences in tuber disease incidence or dry matter content between the treatments. At 25 wk, the untreated tubers had ca 50% greater loss of tuber mass than any other treatment, attributable to their heavy sprouting. Loss of tuber mass in the ethylene treatments was not significantly different (P<0.001) from that in the CIPC treatment.