首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The future of fish passage science,engineering, and practice
Authors:Ana T. Silva  Martyn C. Lucas  Theodore Castro‐Santos  Christos Katopodis  Lee J. Baumgartner  Jason D. Thiem  Kim Aarestrup  Paulo S. Pompeu  Gordon C. O'Brien  Douglas C. Braun  Nicholas J. Burnett  David Z. Zhu  Hans‐Petter Fjeldstad  Torbjørn Forseth  Nallamuthu Rajaratnam  John G. Williams  Steven J. Cooke
Affiliation:1. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research ‐ NINA, Trondheim, Norway;2. Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada;3. Department of Biosciences, University of Durham, Durham, UK;4. U.S. Geological Survey, Leetown Science Center, S. O. Conte Anadromous Fish Research Center, Turners Falls, MA, USA;5. Katopodis Ecohydraulics Ltd., Winnipeg, MB, Canada;6. Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Thurgoona, NSW, Australia;7. Department of Primary Industries, Narrandera Fisheries Centre, Narrandera, NSW, Australia;8. National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark;9. Department of Biology, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil;10. School of Life Sciences, Aquatic Ecosystem Research Programme, University of KwaZulu‐Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;11. InStream Fisheries Research Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada;12. School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada;13. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;14. SINTEF Energy AS, Trondheim, Norway;15. School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Abstract:Much effort has been devoted to developing, constructing and refining fish passage facilities to enable target species to pass barriers on fluvial systems, and yet, fishway science, engineering and practice remain imperfect. In this review, 17 experts from different fish passage research fields (i.e., biology, ecology, physiology, ecohydraulics, engineering) and from different continents (i.e., North and South America, Europe, Africa, Australia) identified knowledge gaps and provided a roadmap for research priorities and technical developments. Once dominated by an engineering‐focused approach, fishway science today involves a wide range of disciplines from fish behaviour to socioeconomics to complex modelling of passage prioritization options in river networks. River barrier impacts on fish migration and dispersal are currently better understood than historically, but basic ecological knowledge underpinning the need for effective fish passage in many regions of the world, including in biodiversity hotspots (e.g., equatorial Africa, South‐East Asia), remains largely unknown. Designing efficient fishways, with minimal passage delay and post‐passage impacts, requires adaptive management and continued innovation. While the use of fishways in river restoration demands a transition towards fish passage at the community scale, advances in selective fishways are also needed to manage invasive fish colonization. Because of the erroneous view in some literature and communities of practice that fish passage is largely a proven technology, improved international collaboration, information sharing, method standardization and multidisciplinary training are needed. Further development of regional expertise is needed in South America, Asia and Africa where hydropower dams are currently being planned and constructed.
Keywords:dams  ecohydraulics  fish conservation  fish migration  fishway  standardization
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号