首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于价值工程原理的乡村秸秆清洁供暖技术经济评价
引用本文:丛宏斌,姚宗路,赵立欣,孟海波,霍丽丽,袁艳文,任雅薇,刘广华,刘圣勇.基于价值工程原理的乡村秸秆清洁供暖技术经济评价[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(9):200-205.
作者姓名:丛宏斌  姚宗路  赵立欣  孟海波  霍丽丽  袁艳文  任雅薇  刘广华  刘圣勇
作者单位:1. 农业农村部规划设计研究院农村能源与环保研究所,北京 100125; 2. 农业农村部农业废弃物能源化利用重点实验室,北京 100125;,1. 农业农村部规划设计研究院农村能源与环保研究所,北京 100125; 2. 农业农村部农业废弃物能源化利用重点实验室,北京 100125;,1. 农业农村部规划设计研究院农村能源与环保研究所,北京 100125; 2. 农业农村部农业废弃物能源化利用重点实验室,北京 100125;,1. 农业农村部规划设计研究院农村能源与环保研究所,北京 100125; 2. 农业农村部农业废弃物能源化利用重点实验室,北京 100125;,1. 农业农村部规划设计研究院农村能源与环保研究所,北京 100125; 2. 农业农村部农业废弃物能源化利用重点实验室,北京 100125;,1. 农业农村部规划设计研究院农村能源与环保研究所,北京 100125; 2. 农业农村部农业废弃物能源化利用重点实验室,北京 100125;,1. 农业农村部规划设计研究院农村能源与环保研究所,北京 100125; 2. 农业农村部农业废弃物能源化利用重点实验室,北京 100125;,3. 承德市本特生态能源技术有限公司,承德 067000;,4. 河南农业大学机电工程学院,郑州450002;
基金项目:现代农业产业技术体系专项资金资助(CARS-02)
摘    要:秸秆供暖可促进秸秆综合利用,推进中国北方乡村清洁供暖。在深入调研和归纳总结现阶段秸秆清洁供暖技术现状的基础上,提出了具有较好应用前景的乡村秸秆清洁供暖典型模式,建立了其功能评价指标体系,并采用价值工程原理和层次分析法,对7种典型模式的技术经济性进行了评价。研究结果表明,在不考虑资源禀赋、交通运输、自然地理、经济社会发展水平等外部条件的情况下,热电联产供暖、热解联产分户供暖、捆烧锅炉集中供暖、热解联产集中供暖、成型燃料分户供暖、捆烧锅炉分户供暖和成型燃料集中供暖对应的价值系数依次为1.062、1.050、1.005、0.990、0.973、0.965、0.956。该研究可为指导秸秆乡村清洁供暖技术研发和应用推广提供重要借鉴。

关 键 词:供暖  秸秆  农村  价值工程  技术经济评价
收稿时间:2018/8/10 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/4/11 0:00:00

Technical and economic evaluation for clean heating using straw in rural area based on principle of value engineering
Cong Hongbin,Yao Zonglu,Zhao Lixin,Meng Haibo,Huo Lili,Yuan Yanwen,Ren Yawei,Liu Guanghua and Liu Shengyong.Technical and economic evaluation for clean heating using straw in rural area based on principle of value engineering[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2019,35(9):200-205.
Authors:Cong Hongbin  Yao Zonglu  Zhao Lixin  Meng Haibo  Huo Lili  Yuan Yanwen  Ren Yawei  Liu Guanghua and Liu Shengyong
Institution:1. Center of Energy and Environmental Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Energy Resource Utilization from Agriculture Residue, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People''s Republic of China, Beijing 100125, China;,1. Center of Energy and Environmental Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Energy Resource Utilization from Agriculture Residue, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People''s Republic of China, Beijing 100125, China;,1. Center of Energy and Environmental Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Energy Resource Utilization from Agriculture Residue, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People''s Republic of China, Beijing 100125, China;,1. Center of Energy and Environmental Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Energy Resource Utilization from Agriculture Residue, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People''s Republic of China, Beijing 100125, China;,1. Center of Energy and Environmental Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Energy Resource Utilization from Agriculture Residue, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People''s Republic of China, Beijing 100125, China;,1. Center of Energy and Environmental Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Energy Resource Utilization from Agriculture Residue, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People''s Republic of China, Beijing 100125, China;,1. Center of Energy and Environmental Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Energy Resource Utilization from Agriculture Residue, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of People''s Republic of China, Beijing 100125, China;,3. Chengde Bente Ecology & Technology Co., Ltd., Chengde 067000, China; and 4. College of Mechanical & Eletrical Engineering of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
Abstract:The proportion of clean heating in northern China is low, especially bulk coal is widely used in winter in some areas. The emission amount of air pollutants is large, so it is urgent to promote clean heating. By the end of 2016, the total heating area of urban and rural buildings in northern China was about 20.6 billion m3, of which the heating area of rural buildings was 6.5 billion m3. Heating energy mainly includes coal, natural gas, electric energy, geothermal energy, biomass energy, solar energy, industrial waste heat and so on. Among them, coal-fired heating area accounts for about 83% of the total heating area. About 400 million tons of standard coals are consumed annually, of which 200 million tons of standard coals are bulk coals mainly distributed in rural areas. In rural areas, the total usage amount of bulk coal is large, burning season is concentrated, the discharge is dispersed, and without purification measures, so the pollutant discharge is serious. China is rich in crop straw, with theoretical resources exceeding 900 million tons, and among them still about 200 million tons are not effectively utilized. The rural straw clean heating can build distributed clean hearing system in rural areas by collecting local raw materials, processing and transforming on the spot, and consuming nearby. This model could reduce open-air burning of rural straw, provide clean heat, and realize directly replacement of coal burning in terminal consumption link. The rural straw clean heating has a great development space. Heating using straw could promote straw comprehensive utilization, and also promote clean heating in rural areas in northern China. Based on investigation and summary of present situation of straw clean heating technology, this paper puts forward a typical rural straw clean heating model with good application prospects, establishes the functional evaluation index system, and evaluates the technical economy of seven typical models by using the value engineering principle and the analytic hierarchy process. The results show that, without considering the external conditions such as resource endowment, transportation, physical geography and level of economic and social development, the corresponding value coefficients of CHP(combined heat and power) heating, pyrolysis cogeneration household heating, bundle-fired boiler central heating, pyrolysis cogeneration central heating, briquette fuel household heating, bundle-fired boiler household heating and briquette fuel central heating are 1.062, 1.050, 1.005, 0.990, 0.973, 0.965, 0.956, respectively. Overall, cogeneration, pyrolysis, bundle-fired and other technologies show relatively good economy for clean heating of rural straw. This study can provide important reference for guiding R&D and application of straw clean heating technology in rural area.
Keywords:heating  straw  rural area  principle of value engineering  technical and economic evaluation
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号