| 吉林省不同黑土土壤微生物学肥力指标差异 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴海燕,范作伟,陈帅民,李阳阳,沙洪林,迟畅,马巍,朱平,吴桂萍,彭畅.吉林省不同黑土土壤微生物学肥力指标差异[J].玉米科学,2020,28(2):163-168. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴海燕 范作伟 陈帅民 李阳阳 沙洪林 迟畅 马巍 朱平 吴桂萍 彭畅 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 长春 130033,吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 长春 130033,吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 长春 130033,吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 长春 130033,吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 长春 130033,吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 长春 130033,吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 长春 130033,吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 长春 130033,吉林省双辽市植物检疫站, 吉林 双辽 136400,吉林省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所, 长春 130033 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 吉林省农业科技创新工程项目（CXGC2018ZY015）、吉林省科技厅重大招标专项“玉米、水稻氮磷面源污染防控技术集成研究与示范”（20170203002NY） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 选择吉林省不同肥力黑土，开展高、中、低肥力土壤微生物数量、土壤微生物量碳、微生物量氮及土壤酶活性等微生物学指标测定，系统分析不同肥力土壤微生物学指标差异，拟合不同肥力土壤与微生物学肥力指标的关联性，确定不同肥力土壤微生物学指标参考标准值。结果表明，不同肥力土壤微生物学肥力指标有很大差异，高肥力土壤具有较高的细菌、放线菌、微生物量碳、微生物氮数量以及土壤酶活性，真菌数量较低，为细菌型健康土壤；低肥力土壤细菌、放线菌、微生物量碳、微生物氮数量和土壤酶活性较低，真菌数量较高。提出吉林省不同肥力土壤相关微生物指标临界阈值，建立不同肥力土壤微生物学肥力指标评价标准。
|
| 关 键 词： | 玉米 吉林省 不同肥力土壤 微生物学肥力 评价指标 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019/4/16 0:00:00 |
Evaluation Index Differences of Microbial Fertility in Different Fertility of Mollisols in Jilin Province |
| |
| WU Hai-yan,FAN Zuo-wei,CHEN Shuai-yang,LI Yang-yang,SHA Hong-lin,CHI Chang,MA Wei,ZHU Ping,WU Gui-ping and PENG Chang.Evaluation Index Differences of Microbial Fertility in Different Fertility of Mollisols in Jilin Province[J].Journal of Maize Sciences,2020,28(2):163-168. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Hai-yan FAN Zuo-wei CHEN Shuai-yang LI Yang-yang SHA Hong-lin CHI Chang MA Wei ZHU Ping WU Gui-ping and PENG Chang |
| |
| Institution: | Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033,Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033,Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033,Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033,Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033,Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033,Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033,Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033,Shuangliao Plant Quarantine Station of Jilin Province, Shuangliao 136400, China and Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun 130033 |
| |
| Abstract: | Selection of different fertility black soil in Jilin province, the soil microbial flora, soil microbial biomass carbon, soil microbial biomass nitrogen and soil enzyme activity were measured in high, medium and low fertility soils. The differences of microbial indicators in different fertility soil were systematically analyzed, and the correlations between different fertility soil and microbial indicators were fitted, and the reference standard values of soil microbial indicators for different fertility soil were determined. The results showed that the soil microbial fertility index varied greatly with different fertility soil. High fertility soil had higher bacteria, actinomycetes, microbial biomass carbon, microbial nitrogen and soil enzyme activity, but the number of fungi was lower, which was healthy soil. The number of bacteria, actinomycetes, microbial biomass carbon, microbial nitrogen and soil enzyme activity in low fertility soil were lower, and the number of fungi was higher. The critical thresholds of soil-related microbial indexes for different fertility soil in Jilin province were proposed, and the evaluation criteria of microbial fertility indexes for different fertility soil were established. |
| |
| Keywords: | Maize Jilin province Different fertility soil Microbial fertility Evaluation index |
|
| 点击此处可从《玉米科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《玉米科学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
