首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于环境评价的贵阳市土地开发利用优化
引用本文:沈孝强,吴次芳,俞振宁,罗文斌,吕添贵.基于环境评价的贵阳市土地开发利用优化[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):97-102.
作者姓名:沈孝强  吴次芳  俞振宁  罗文斌  吕添贵
作者单位:1. 浙江大学公共管理学院,浙江杭州,310029;2. 湖南师范大学旅游学院,湖南长沙,410081;3. 江西财经大学旅游与城市管理学院,江西南昌,330013
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目“促进区域协调发展的差别化土地调控政策研究”(13AZD012);国家自然科学基金项目“农村土地整理的治理绩效测度、行为过程机理及政策仿真研究”(41301629)
摘    要:目的]结合贵州省贵阳市环境承载力和环境承载量综合评价贵阳市环境状况,为优化土地开发利用提供依据。方法]分别运用生态足迹理论和能值分析方法评价环境承载力和环境承载量,利用灰色预测模型模拟未来环境演化状况。结果]贵阳市环境承载力波动明显,耕地和建设用地生物生产面积变化是主要驱动力;环境承载量快速上升,石油、电力等能源类和建材类、磷矿的能值消耗量大幅增加,废气成为污染物同化的主要压力源。结论]贵阳市当前未出现环境赤字,但根据预测结果,未来环境负荷将会超过环境承受能力阀值,危害区域生态环境安全。需要采取策略优化贵阳市土地开发利用,以避免出现环境赤字,促进可持续发展。

关 键 词:环境承载力  环境承载量  土地利用  贵阳市
收稿时间:2015/9/23 0:00:00
修稿时间:2015/11/1 0:00:00

Optimizing Land Use for Guiyang City Based on Environmental Assessment
SHEN Xiaoqiang,WU Cifang,YU Zhenning,LUO Wenbin and L&#; Tiangui.Optimizing Land Use for Guiyang City Based on Environmental Assessment[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,36(4):97-102.
Authors:SHEN Xiaoqiang  WU Cifang  YU Zhenning  LUO Wenbin and L&#; Tiangui
Institution:School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310029, China,School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310029, China,School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310029, China,College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hu''nan 410081, China and School of Tourism and Urban Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China
Abstract:Objective] The environmental situation of Guiyang City of Guizhou Province was comprehensively assessed to provide guidance for optimizing land use. Methods] Ecological footprint and energy theory were used respectively to quantify environmental carrying capacity(ECC) and environmental load, both of which were stimulated by Grey model for the changing tendency in near future. Results] ECC fluctuated noticeably since 2005 which was predominantly driven by the variation of arable land and construction land. In contrast, environmental load increased stably and quickly, which was mainly caused by the significant expansion of consumptions of petroleum, electric power, building materials and phosphate, and by the ever growing emission of exhaust gas. Conclusion] Environmental load has been below ECC so for, but environmental deficit would come according to the prediction. Measurements that tailored to the main influence factors of ECC and environmental load should be taken to avoid environmental deficit and to facilitating local sustainable development.
Keywords:environmental carrying capacity  environmental load  land use  Guiyang City
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水土保持通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水土保持通报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号