Alternative strategies for nitrogen fertilization of overwinter processing spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) in Southern Italy |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell''Emilia Romagna (IZSLER), Via Bianchi no. 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy;2. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Lazio e Toscana (IZSLT), via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome (Capannelle), Italy;3. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Mezzogiorno, Via Salute, 2, 80055 Portici (Naples), Italy;4. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell''Umbria e delle Marche (IZSUM), Via G. Salvemini, no. 1, 06126 Perugia, Italy;5. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Viale dell''Universita'', 10-35020 Legnaro (Padua), Italy;6. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia, Via G.Marinuzzi, 3, 90129 Palermo, Italy;7. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d''Aosta (IZSPLV), via Bologna, 148, 10154 Turin, Italy;8. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata (IZSPB), via Manfredonia, n. 20, 71121 Foggia, Italy;9. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, Via Duca degli Abruzzi 8, 07100 Sassari, Italy;10. Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy;1. Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods, Food Science and Technology, CEBAS-CSIC, PO Box 164, Espinardo, Murcia E-30100, Spain;2. Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Laboratory of Food Preservation and Food Microbiology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links, 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;3. Division of Risk and Benefit Assessment, National Food Agency, SE-75126 Uppsala, Sweden |
| |
| Abstract: | To identify the best practice for nitrogen (N) fertilization of overwinter processing spinach, two field experiments were carried out in the Foggia plain (Southern Italy), one of the most vocated area for leafy vegetables production. The field trials were aimed to define and suggest the proper fertilizer dose, typology and the right time of application. Experiment 1 evaluated four N fertilizer doses (0, 150, 225, 300 kg ha−1) in a two-year field trial. Experiment 2 was aimed to assess the effect of the split distribution of prilled urea fertilizer in comparison with the application of nitrification inhibitor (DMPP) containing urea fertilizer, broadcasted at sowing.Spinach yield, yield quality (nitrate – NO3− – and carotenoids content), N-use efficiency and risk of soil nitrate (NO3−-N) leaching were evaluated. The processing spinach yielded 37.8 and 3.6 t ha−1 of fresh and dry yield, respectively (average of the two experiments). Fresh and dry yield among the fertilizing treatments were similar. Also the β-carotene and the lutein content of spinach leaves (19.5 and 38.1 mg kg−1, respectively) were not affected by the N fertilizer dose. Conversely, the N dose strongly influenced the NO3− content of the leafy vegetable tissues (1286 mg kg−1 on average, 58% lower than the limits imposed by the EC regulation). As expected, the different rainfall pattern influenced both the leaf NO3− content and the risk of soil NO3−-N leaching. The results achieved demonstrated that, in order to get a favorable trade-off, among yield, yield quality, N-use efficiency and environmental impact, the processing spinach growers of the Foggia plain area should be encouraged to apply 225 kg N ha−1 as maximum fertilization rate. Also, the split urea fertilizer application appeared as the more effective strategy for N fertilization of overwinter spinach in comparison with the use of the nitrification inhibitor containing urea fertilizer, being the last strategy not able to adequately match the N crop demand. |
| |
| Keywords: | Slow-release N Urea fertilizer DMPP N-use efficiency Nitrate leaching |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
