首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Thinning, burning, and thin-burn fuel treatment effects on soil properties in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest
Authors:Emily EY Moghaddas  Scott L Stephens
Institution:

aDivision of Ecosystem Science, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, 137 Mulford Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3114, United States

Abstract:More than a century of fire exclusion and past timber management practices in many Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests have led to increased stand densities and fuel accumulation, with a corresponding risk of large, high severity wildfires. To reduce hazardous fuel accumulations and restore the health and natural processes of forest ecosystems, fuel management programs often employ thinning and prescribed fire treatments, both alone and in combination. We evaluated forest floor and mineral soil chemical and physical characteristics following these treatments in a managed Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest using a fully replicated study design with four separate treatments: THIN, BURN, THIN + BURN, and an untreated CONTROL. Compared to the CONTROL, the BURN and THIN + BURN treatments consumed a large amount of the forest floor, reducing the mass and depth by more than 80%. These treatments reduced the forest floor C and N pools by more than 85%, resulting in reductions of 25 Mg C ha?1 and more than 700 kg N ha?1 from the forest floor. Despite these large losses from the organic horizons, no significant differences in mineral soil total C and N pools were detected among treatments. Compared with the CONTROL and THIN treatments, the BURN and THIN + BURN significantly increased the mineral soil NO3-N concentration, pool of inorganic N, pH, and exposed bare soil. The THIN + BURN treatment significantly increased the concentrations of NH4-N and exchangeable Ca relative to the CONTROL. No significant differences in the net rates of nitrification, N mineralization, or bulk density were detected among the four treatments. The BURN treatment reduced mineral soil C concentration and CEC, while the THIN + BURN treatment had the greatest increase in inorganic N. Fire effects on soil pH and inorganic N were moderated in skid trails due to reduced fuel continuity and consumption. In light of the current management emphasis on hazardous fuels reduction, we recommend that researchers investigating fire effects in harvested stands include skid trail influences in their study design.
Keywords:Fuel treatment  Soil  Sierra Nevada  Skid trail  Forest restoration
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号