首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

西藏林芝高产春青稞品种冠层形态结构特性分析
引用本文:卓嘎,次仁央金,韦泽秀,白玛德吉,次旺平措,何燕.西藏林芝高产春青稞品种冠层形态结构特性分析[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(6):21-31.
作者姓名:卓嘎  次仁央金  韦泽秀  白玛德吉  次旺平措  何燕
作者单位:西藏农牧学院, 西藏 林芝 860000,西藏农牧学院, 西藏 林芝 860000,西藏自治区农业资源与环境研究所, 拉萨 850000,西藏农牧学院, 西藏 林芝 860000,西藏米林县农业技术推广站, 西藏 米林 86000,西藏农牧学院, 西藏 林芝 860000
基金项目:国家科技支撑项目(2013BAD3OBO1);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项西南区栽培与土肥岗位(CARS-XX);西部提升计划作物学学科建设(No.XBTSZWXK-01)
摘    要:为探明冠层形态结构特性对林芝地区春青稞产量的影响,以高产和中高产2种类型8个春青稞品种为材料,采用高产栽培方法,分析了高产春青稞品种群体动态及其冠层形态结构特性。试验结果表明:高产品种与中高产品种相比,1)产量:平均高28.5%;2)单位面积穗数、穗粒数、平方米粒数和千粒重平均分别高8.5%、10.4%、15.6%和16.1%;3)分蘖期最大总茎数低20.11%,干物质积累量低28.3%;拔节期-灌浆期间分蘖消亡速度低17.44%;抽穗期干物质积累量高17.5%,分蘖成穗率高9.06%;4)冠层形态:上三叶叶面积分别大94.52%、59.02%和40.50%;上三叶基角、开张角和披垂度均表现为旗叶倒二叶倒三叶的规律;具有较高的株高和基部第2节间粗短的茎秆特性以及长穗和穗下节间长而粗的穗部特性。

关 键 词:西藏  青稞  品种类型  产量  冠层结构
收稿时间:2016/6/15 0:00:00

Analysis on canopy architecture and growth performance of high yield spring barley cultivars in Tibet region
ZHUO G,CI Ren yangjin,WEI Zexiu,BAI MA deji,CI WANG pingcuo and HE Yan.Analysis on canopy architecture and growth performance of high yield spring barley cultivars in Tibet region[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2017,22(6):21-31.
Authors:ZHUO G  CI Ren yangjin  WEI Zexiu  BAI MA deji  CI WANG pingcuo and HE Yan
Institution:Xizang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi 860000, China,Xizang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi 860000, China,Institute of Resources and Environment, Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa 850032, China,Xizang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi 860000, China,Center for Popularization of Agricultural Technical of Milin, Milin 860000, China and Xizang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi 860000, China
Abstract:In order to understand the relationships of canopy architecture and yield formation in spring barley,a two-year experiment (2014-2015) was conducted by using eight spring barley cultivars in Linzhi area,Tibet.The results showed that high-yield (HY) cultivars had 28.5% higher mean yield than those medium-yield (MY) cultivars,probably as a results of increasing in ear/m2 by 8.5%,spike lets per ear by 10.4%,spike lets/m2 by 15.6%,and kernel weight by 16.1%,respectively.At tiller stage,mean maximum tiller number of HY cultivars was 20.11% lower than that of MY cultivars,and dry matter accumulation was 28.3% lower.Tiller mortality mainly appeared in the period from elongation to grain-filling stage,and the mortality rate of HY cultivars was 17.44% lower than that of MY cultivars.At heading stage,HY cultivars were superior to MY cultivars in dry matter accumulation and percentage of ear-bearing tillers with 17.5% and 9.06% higher,respectively.Regarding canopy architecture,top three leaves area of HY barley cultivars were 94.52,59.02 and 40.50% larger than that of MY cultivars,respectively.The values of basic leaf angle,open angle,and leaf drooping degree of the top three leaves of HY cultivars showed the same pattern:flag leaf < 2nd top leaf < 3rd top leaf.Furthermore,HY cultivars had higher plant height,thicker and shorter basal 2nd internode,and longer ears with a longer and stronger jointed internode.
Keywords:Tibet  high yield  barley  cultivar  canopy architecture
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农业大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农业大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号