首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Comparison of a gas detection tubes test with the traditional alkaline trap method to evaluate compost stability
Authors:Marta Benito  Alberto Masaguer  Ana Moliner  Craig G Cogger  Andy I Bary
Institution:(1) Departamento de Silvopascicultura, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain;(2) Departamento de Edafología, Escuela Técnica Superior Ingenieros Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avd. Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain;(3) Deparment of Crop and Soil Science, Washington State University, Puyallup Research and Extension Center, 7612 Pioneer Way E., Puyallup, WA 98371-4998, USA
Abstract:Compost stability is an important parameter of compost quality. Among tests proposed to evaluate compost stability, microbial respiration is one of the better accepted tests. Variations in rates of CO2 evolution during composting were studied in two pilot pruning waste piles using a windrow composting system. To measure the CO2 production rate, two methods were compared: the alkaline trap test and gas detection tubes. Both respiration tests indicated increasing compost stability with processing time, but CO2 evolution rates from the alkaline trap method were higher than values from the gas detection tube method. A first-order kinetic equation was used to describe CO2 evolution over time. A linear relationship (r=0.81, p<0.01) was found between the two methods. Although both methods could distinguish unstable compost from stable compost, CO2 detection tubes were easier to use and gave results in a shorter period of time.
Keywords:Compost stability  Pruning waste  Composting  Microbial respiration
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号