首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同饲养方式下的羊产排污系数对比研究
引用本文:李丹阳,王娟,袁京,亓传仁,张燕卿,丁京涛,王惠惠,沈玉君,李国学.不同饲养方式下的羊产排污系数对比研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2023,42(3):672-681.
作者姓名:李丹阳  王娟  袁京  亓传仁  张燕卿  丁京涛  王惠惠  沈玉君  李国学
作者单位:农业农村部规划设计研究院农村能源与环保研究所, 北京 100125;中国农业大学资源与环境学院农田土壤污染防控与修复北京市重点实验室, 北京 100193;农业农村部种养结合重点实验室, 北京 100125;农业农村部规划设计研究院农村能源与环保研究所, 北京 100125;农业农村部种养结合重点实验室, 北京 100125
基金项目:农业农村部种养结合重点实验室开放课题(ZY2020-4);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-39-19)
摘    要:为了对比研究不同饲养方式下的羊产排污系数,在我国云贵高原牧区选择一家以半放牧半舍饲为饲养方式的规模化羊场,在长江中下游丘陵地区选择一家全舍饲的规模化羊场作为试验地点,对不同饲养阶段的贵州半细毛羊和湖羊的产污系数和排污系数进行了测定。结果表明:产污系数方面,贵州半细毛羊的平均粪便量、尿液量、化学需氧量(COD)、总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)、铵态氮(NH+4-N)、硝态氮(NO-3-N)、铜(Cu)和锌(Zn)产污系数分别为0.97 kg·d-1·只-1、0.53 L·d-1·只-1、318.01 g·d-1·只-1、7.12 g·d-1·只-1、2.03 g·d-1·只-1、2.89 g·d-1·只-1、41.00 mg·d-1·只-1、0.76 mg·d-1·只-1、14.77 mg·d-1·只-1;湖羊的数值分别为0.99 kg·d-1·只-1、0.56 L·d-1·只-1、384.76 g·d-1·只-1、8.98 g·d-1·只-1、1.56 g·d-1·只-1、1.46 g·d-1·只-1、41.34 mg·d-1·只-1、0.38 mg·d-1·只-1、41.84 mg·d-1·只-1。粪便量与饲料量、尿液量与饮水量之间均呈显著正相关。排污系数方面,排污系数除受产污系数影响外,还与粪便量、粪尿中污染物浓度、饲养方式等有关。排污系数与产污系数的比值(排产比)与羊饲养方式和清粪方式有关,以全舍饲为饲养方式的羊场各污染物排产比均低于半放牧半舍饲羊场。因此,在不考虑成本和养殖规模的前提下,为了控制羊养殖业对环境造成的污染,应首选全舍饲的饲养方式。

关 键 词:羊|饲养方式|产污系数|排污系数
收稿时间:2022/5/30 0:00:00

Comparative study of pollutant production and the discharge coefficient of sheep under different feeding methods
LI Danyang,WANG Juan,YUAN Jing,QI Chuanren,ZHANG Yanqing,DING Jingtao,WANG Huihui,SHEN Yujun,LI Guoxue.Comparative study of pollutant production and the discharge coefficient of sheep under different feeding methods[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science( J. Agro-Environ. Sci.),2023,42(3):672-681.
Authors:LI Danyang  WANG Juan  YUAN Jing  QI Chuanren  ZHANG Yanqing  DING Jingtao  WANG Huihui  SHEN Yujun  LI Guoxue
Institution:Institute of Energy and Environmental Protection, Academy of Agricultural Planning and Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100125, China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resource and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;Key Laboratory of Plant and Breeding Combination, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100125, China;Institute of Energy and Environmental Protection, Academy of Agricultural Planning and Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100125, China;Key Laboratory of Plant and Breeding Combination, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100125, China
Abstract:To compare pollutant production and the discharge coefficient of sheep under different feeding methods, a large-scale sheep farm with half pasturing and half pen feeding in the pastoral areas of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, and another sheep farm with full pen feeding in the hilly areas of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River in China were selected as experimental sites. Pollutant production and the discharge coefficient of Guizhou semi-fine wool sheep and Hu sheep were measured at different feeding stages. The results showed that the pollutant production coefficient of manure, urine, chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, copper, and zinc were 0.97 kg·d-1, 0.53 L·d-1, 318.01 g·d-1, 7.12 g·d-1, 2.03 g·d-1, 2.89 g·d-1, 41.00 mg·d-1, 0.76 mg·d-1, and 14.77 mg·d-1, respectively, for every Guizhou semi-fine wool sheep and 0.99 kg·d-1, 0.56 L·d-1, 384.76 g·d-1, 8.98 g·d-1, 1.56 g·d-1, 1.46 g·d-1, 41.34 mg·d-1, 0.38 mg·d-1, and 41.84 mg·d-1, respectively, for every Hu sheep. There were significant positive relationships between feces weight and feed weight and between urine volume and water volume. The pollutant discharge coefficient was affected by the pollutant production coefficient, and was related to feces weight, the concentration of pollutants in feces and urine, and the feeding method. The ratio of the pollutant discharge coefficient to the production coefficient was related to the sheep feeding method and the excrement cleaning method. This ratio was lower for sheep farms with full pen feeding than those with half pasturing and half pen feeding. Therefore, if the cost and breeding scale are not considered, to control the environmental pollution caused by the sheep breeding industry in China, the full pen feeding method is recommended.
Keywords:sheep|feeding method|pollutant production coefficient|pollutant discharge coefficient
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号