基于AHP-熵权法的地下水水质模糊综合评价——以白城市为例 |
| |
引用本文: | 郝洋,梁秀娟,孟凡傲,肖长来,王百阳.基于AHP-熵权法的地下水水质模糊综合评价——以白城市为例[J].节水灌溉,2016(6). |
| |
作者姓名: | 郝洋 梁秀娟 孟凡傲 肖长来 王百阳 |
| |
作者单位: | 吉林大学 地下水资源与环境教育部重点实验室,长春 130021; 吉林大学 环境与资源学院,长春 130021 |
| |
基金项目: | 国家自然科学基金(41572216),吉林省自然科学基金(20140101164JC),国家自然科学基金(41172205)。 |
| |
摘 要: | 传统的模糊综合评价法采用超标加权法来确定其权重并用最大隶属度原则来确定水质级别,没有考虑数据的地域特点和最大隶属度原则的条件性,评价结果不理想。针对这些问题,采用AHP-熵权法以及引入级别特征值的概念,对地下水水质进行模糊综合评价。以2013年白城市20个地下水水质数据为依据,选取氟化物、总铁、亚硝酸盐氮、锰、总硬度、氯化物、硫酸盐、硝酸盐氮、氨氮共9个指标作为评价指标,进行地下水水质评价。并将其评价结果与内梅罗综合指数法进行对比,结果表明,两种方法计算的结果一致性高达75%。通过AHP法(层次分析法)与熵权法相结合确定的权重,以及引入级别特征值概念确定水质级别,使评价结果更加准确、合理。
|
关 键 词: | AHP法 熵权法 模糊综合评价 级别特征值 水质评价 |
Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Groundwater Quality Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method A Case Study of Baicheng City |
| |
Abstract: | Traditional fuzzy comprehensive evaluation determines the weights by over weighted method and determines the groundwa-ter quality grade by the principle of maximum degree of membership.Without considering regional characteristics of data and appli-cable conditions of level feature values,the evaluation result is not ideal.To solve these problems,this paper chooses fuzzy compre-hensive evaluation method,which determines the weight by AHP-entropy weight and determines the grade by the principle of max-imum degree of membership,to evaluate the groundwater quality.Taking F, Fe,NO-2 ,Mn,total hardness,Cl-,SO-4 ,NO-3 , NH+4 as evaluation indicators,20 samples of groundwater quality in Baicheng City in 2013 are evaluated.The comparison between the results of AHP-entropy weight method and the results of Nemero index method shows that the results of the two methods are nearly coincident to 75%.Determining the weights by mixing AHP with entropy weight and applying the principle of maximum de-gree of membership makes the results more exact and reasonable. |
| |
Keywords: | AHP entropy weight fuzzy comprehensive evaluation level feature values water quality evaluation |
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|