Agronomic Effectiveness of Cationic Phosphate Impurities Present in Superphosphate Fertilizers as Affected by Soil pH

Abstract

The general concept that low‐water‐soluble phosphorus (P) fertilizers should be more agronomically effective when applied to acidic soils was developed based on sources containing mainly calcium (Ca)‐P compounds, but it may not hold true for sources with different chemical composition. To obtain information related to this issue, two important iron (Fe)–potassium (K)–P compounds present in superphosphates Fe₃KH₈(PO₄)₆ · 6H₂O, H8, and Fe₃KH₁₄(PO₄)₈ · 4H₂O, H14] were prepared and characterized. These P sources were used to provide 30 and 60 mg P kg^?1 as neutral ammonium citrate (NAC)+H₂O‐soluble P. Reagent‐grade monocalcium phosphate (MCP) was used as a standard P source with high water solubility with an additional rate of 120 mg P kg^?1 included. Also, mixtures of both Fe‐K‐P compounds and MCP were prepared to provide 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of the total P as MCP. All sources were applied to a clayey loamy acid soil (pH 5.3) classified as Rhodic Kanhapludult. The soil was incubated at two rates (0 and 10 g kg^?1) of lime, which resulted in pH 5.4 and 6.8. Upland rice was cultivated to maturity. The H14 compound confirmed to be a highly effective source of P for the rice plants at both soil pH, as opposed to the H8, which was poorly effective when applied alone. When mixed with water‐soluble P (WSP), the H8 was able to provide P to the plants with the maximum yield of upland rice reached with 54.8 and 80.5% of WSP for pH 5.4 and 6.8, respectively. The high agronomic performance of the H14 compound clearly indicates that this low‐water‐soluble P source cannot be deemed as ineffective at high soil pH.