| Abstract: | Abstract Two single value methods of indexing P sorption were compared to parameters derived from P adsorption isotherms in a range of waterlogged and dry rice soils. These measures of P sorption capacity correlated closely with one another. However, they did not correlate equally with several other soil properties (pH, extractable Fe and Al). Because relationships between P sorption and soil properties proved to be method dependent, results from different methods must be compared with caution. It is suggested that the single value method of Bache and Williams2 be adopted when the rapid analyses of many samples is required. It is suited to routine analysis of soils with markedly different P sorption capacities, from both waterlogged and dry conditions. Close correlations between the single value methods and P sorbed at a standard supernatant concentration suggest they may be useful in testing soils for P fertilizer requirements. |
