首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Pulse versus continuous peracetic acid applications: Effects on rainbow trout performance,biofilm formation and water quality
Institution:1. Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Mueggelseedamm 301, 12587 Berlin, Germany;2. DTU-Aqua, National Institute of Aquatic Sciences, Section for Aquaculture, North Sea Research Centre, P.O. Box 101, DK-9850 Hirtshals, Denmark;3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Harry K. Dupree—Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center, P.O. Box 1050, Stuttgart, AR 72160, USA
Abstract:Peracetic acid (PAA) products are being introduced to aquaculture as sustainable disinfectants. Two strategies are used to apply PAA: high dose pulse applications, or low dose continuous application. In the present study, their impacts on fish health and water quality were investigated in triplicate flow-through tanks stocked with rainbow trout. The gentler and shorter water cortisol increase measured along twice-per-week pulse applications of 1 mg L?1 PAA indicated a progressive adaptation of fish. In contrast, the continuous application of 0.2 mg L?1 PAA caused no stress to fish. Meanwhile, no mortality and no impact on growth or innate cellular immunity were observed. The pulse applications restricted biofilm formation, and partially inhibited nitrification. Additionally, the highest oxygen concentration and stable pH were observed. In contrast, the continuous application promoted biofilm formation, and caused a pH increase and intermediate oxygen concentration. The contrast was probably due to different susceptibility of microbes to PAA-induced oxidative stress. To summarize, pulse PAA applications cause minor stress in fish, but have advantages over continuous application by ensuring better water quality.
Keywords:Disinfection  Biofilm  Fish welfare  Cortisol  Respiratory burst
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号