首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

紫茎泽兰群体遗传多样性及遗传结构的AFLP分析
引用本文:黄文坤,郭建英,万方浩,高必达,谢丙炎. 紫茎泽兰群体遗传多样性及遗传结构的AFLP分析[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2007, 15(6): 992-1000
作者姓名:黄文坤  郭建英  万方浩  高必达  谢丙炎
作者单位:1. 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所植物病虫害生物学国家重点实验室,北京,100094;农业部外来入侵生物预防与控制研究湖南农业大学生物安全科学技术学院,长沙,410128
2. 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所植物病虫害生物学国家重点实验室,北京,100094;农业部外来入侵生物预防与控制研究中心,北京,100081
3. 湖南农业大学生物安全科学技术学院,长沙,410128
4. 中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所,北京,100081
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)
摘    要:紫茎泽兰是我国最为严重的入侵物种之一。本研究以中国境内的紫茎泽兰为材料,用AFLP方法研究了其群体遗传多样性及遗传分化。用筛选出的3对荧光引物,对5个地区62个群体进行AFLP分析,共扩增出490条带,其中多态性带328条,群体的遗传多样性较高(P = 66.9%,H = 0.171,I = 0.268),主要存在于群体内,群体间的遗传分化系数Fst为0.287。AMOVA分析表明,在地区水平紫茎泽兰的遗传分化主要存地区内,群体内遗传分化占 70.25%,群体间遗传分化占21.71%,地区间的遗传分化仅占8.04%。UPGMA聚类分析结果表明,62个地理群体主要分为四大类群,并且有明显的地缘关系。Sigmaplot分析表明海拔是影响紫茎泽兰遗传多样性主要地理因子。Mantel检验表明遗传距离与地理距离成正相关(r = 0.34),但也有例外。由此推断风媒传播可能是紫茎泽兰的主要传播方式,水媒传播可能是紫茎泽兰的另一主要传播途径;随着紫茎泽向东、向北扩散,新入侵地区的遗传多样性逐步降低。

关 键 词:AFLP  入侵植物  紫茎泽兰  遗传多样性  遗传分化
文章编号:1006-1304(2007)06-0992-09
收稿时间:2007-01-22
修稿时间:2007-03-22

AFLP Analysis on Genetic Diversity and Genetic Structure of Eupatorium adenophorum Populations in China
HUANG Wen-kun,GUO Jian-ying,WAN Fang-hao,GAO Bi-da,XIE Bing-yan. AFLP Analysis on Genetic Diversity and Genetic Structure of Eupatorium adenophorum Populations in China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2007, 15(6): 992-1000
Authors:HUANG Wen-kun  GUO Jian-ying  WAN Fang-hao  GAO Bi-da  XIE Bing-yan
Abstract:Eupatorium adenophorum (Crofton weed) is one of the most widespread invasive species in China. Its genetic diversity and population structure in China were analyzed by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Three primer pairs were selected for the analysis and 490 bands were produced from 62 E. adenophorum populations of 5 major geographic areas in China, of which 328 bands showed polymorphic (P was 59.4%). Diversity levels of populations were relatively high, mean expected heterozygosity (H) was 0.154, mean Shannon index (I ) was 0.241. At the regional level, the AMOVA indicated that about 70.25% variations in the data set were from genotypic variations within populations, 8.04% variations due to regional differences, and the remaining 21.71% due to differences among populations within the provincial regions. Cluster analysis based on the UPGMA method grouped the majority of the 62 E. adenophorum populations into four main clusters, which correspond with their geographic regions. It is concluded that E. adenophorum spread mainly by wind or water and its genetic diversity level in newly invaded area is lower than that in former invaded areas.
Keywords:AFLP
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业生物技术学报》浏览原始摘要信息
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号