首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Relationships between crop temperature,grain yield,evapotranspiration and phenological development in two hybrids of moisture stressed sorghum
Authors:B R Gardner  B L Blad  D P Garrity  D G Watts
Institution:(1) Center for Agricultural Meteorology and Climatology, Departments of Agronomy and Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, 68583 Lincoln, NE, USA
Abstract:Summary Recent studies have shown that the grain yields of corn (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) are related to the degree of water stress they undergo. The purpose of the study reported here was to establish relationships between crop temperature and the grain yields, phenological development, evapotranspiration rates (ET) and leaf water potential (psgr l ) of two hybrids of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) subjected to varying levels of plant water stress. The study was conducted at the University of Nebraska Sandhills Agricultural Laboratory in 1978 on a Typic Ustipsamment (Valentine fine sand) soil. The sorghum hybrids used were RS 626 and NB 505. Four irrigation treatments were applied in order to subject the crops to varying levels of water stress during each of three major growth stages. Soil moisture was monitored with a neutron probe. ET was estimated with the water balance technique. Crop temperature was measured with an IR thermometer and leaf water potential was measured with a Scholander pressure bomb. Grain yields were reduced by water stress occuring at anytime during the growing season. Yield reductions were largest when stress occurred during only the grainfill period and were least when stress occurred during the entire growing season. The percentage reduction in sorghum grain yield can be described by an index involving the seasonal accumulation of the daily mid-day temperature differences between well-watered and stressed crops (Sgr TSD). As Sgr TSD values increased, ET decreased. However, the correlation of ET with Sgr TSD was relatively low (R2 = 0.60) probably due to the limited amount of data available for analysis and inaccuracies in the soil water balance method used to estimate ET. The mid-day temperature of well-watered rows ranged between 18.0 and 32.8 °C with a mid-day temperature range of about 0.5 °C between the well-watered rows in various plots for several days following an irrigation. However, in certain instances, the mid-day temperature range increased to 1–2 °C for a few days before irrigation. This suggests that certain of the rows experienced water stress and should have been irrigated earlier. Yield data support that conclusion. Range in crop temperature within a field appeared to be a sensitive indicator of crop water stress in sorghum. No significant difference in the phenological development of sorghum resulted from water stress except in one NB 505 plot in which plants were stressed throughout the entire season. In that plot, the stressed plants lagged in development behind non-stressed plants by approximately ten days. The differences in mid-day leaf water potentials (Deltapsgr l ) and crop temperatures (DeltaT) between stressed and non-stressed vegetation were examined. As DeltaT increased up to about 4 °C, Deltapsgr l , also increased. Beyond that point, Deltapsgr l decreased while DeltaT continued to increase. This behavior was attributed to stomatal closure which permitted an increase in psgr l of the stressed plants (hence reducing Deltapsgr l ) even as DeltaT continued to increase.Published as Paper No. 6551, Journal Series, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station. The work reported was conducted under Regional Research Project 11–33 and Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Project 11–50. The work upon which this publication is based was supported in part by funds provided by the Office of Water Research and Technology B-044-NEB, US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, as authorized by the Water Research and Development Act of 1978. This article was sponsored in part by the Nebraska Water Resources Center, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-LincolnResearch Assistant, Associate Professor, Research Assistant, and Associate Professor, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Contents of this puplication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Office of Water Research and Technology, US Dept. of the Interior, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute their endorsement or recommendation for use by the United States Government
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号