首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

江南地区大棚促成—避雨栽培下葡萄品种光合特性的比较
引用本文:戴美松,姜卫兵,庄猛,费宪进,李传德.江南地区大棚促成—避雨栽培下葡萄品种光合特性的比较[J].园艺学报,2006,33(1):17-21.
作者姓名:戴美松  姜卫兵  庄猛  费宪进  李传德
作者单位:南京农业大学园艺学院, 南京210095; 镇江市园艺技术指导站, 镇江212003; 浙江省农业科学院园艺研究所,杭州310021
基金项目:江苏省‘十五’科技攻关项目(BE2001325-1)
摘    要: 研究表明, 促成—避雨栽培( Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation, F-C & R-S-C) 条件下7个葡萄品种: ①净光合速率( Pn) 日均值、光饱和点(LSP) 、光补偿点(LCP) 在促成阶段分别为CO2 (5.74 ±4.33) ~ (7.87 ±5.85) 、494~1 110和9.6~5.15 μmol·m-2 ·s-1 , 在避雨阶段分别为(3.85±1.82) ~ (5.62 ±3.23) 、806~1 407和16.5~33.5 μmol·m - 2 ·s- 1 ; 各品种的CO2 饱和点(CSP) 、CO2补偿点(CCP) 在促成阶段分别为717~1 500和60.6~88.0 μL·L - 1 , 在避雨阶段分别为944~1 601和14.1~59.1 μL·L - 1 ; ②在促成阶段的Pn日均值、Pn日高峰值、Pn日积分值、气孔导度( Gs) 、蒸腾速率( Tr) 、LSP和CSP相对于避雨阶段较高, 光合表观量子效率(AQY) 、羧化效率(CE) 、LCP、CCP和多数品种的水分利用效率(WUE) 则较低; ③上述指标在不同栽培阶段各品种间的差异显著, 其中‘黎明无核’、‘里扎马特’和‘郑州早玉’的Pn日均值、WUE、AQY、CE、LSP和CSP均相对较高, 而LCP和CCP相对较低, 较适宜该种设施栽培。

关 键 词:葡萄  品种  促成—避雨栽培  光合特性
文章编号:0513-353X(2006)01-0017-06
收稿时间:2005-01-25
修稿时间:2005-01-252005-04-26

Comparison of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Seven Grapevine Varieties Cultivated in Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation Greenhouse
Dai Meisong,Jiang Weibing,Zhuang Meng,Fei Xianjin,Li Chuande.Comparison of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Seven Grapevine Varieties Cultivated in Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation Greenhouse[J].Acta Horticulturae Sinica,2006,33(1):17-21.
Authors:Dai Meisong  Jiang Weibing  Zhuang Meng  Fei Xianjin  Li Chuande
Institution:Department of Respiratory Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
Abstract:Photosynthetic characteristics of 7 grapevine varieties were studied in Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation ( F-C &; R-S-C) greenhouse by using portable photosynthetic mensurate system CIR-AS-1. The results showed that: ①The value of Pn, LSP, LCP of grapevine varietieswere (5.74 ±4.33) -(7.87 ±5.85) ( is the mean of 7 data point in a day) , 494 - 1 110, 9.6 - 51.5 μmol·m- 2 ·s- 1 respectively during the F-C period, and (3.85 ±1.82) - ( 5.62 ±3.23) , 806 - 1 407, 16.5 - 33.5 μmol·m-2 ·s-1 respectively during the R-S-C period; The value of CSP, CCP of grapevine varieties were 717 - 1 500, 60.6 - 88.0 μL·L -1 respectively during the F-C period, and 944 - 1 601, 14.1 - 59.1μL ·L -1 respectively during the R-S-C period; ②There were higher value of diurnalmean of Pn, diurnal peak of Pn, diurnal integral of Pn, Gs, Tr, LSP, CSP and lower value of AQY, CE, LCP, CCP during the F-C period than those during the R-S-C period. WUE ofmost varieties are higher during the R-S-C period; ③Comparison of photosynthetic parameters before-mentioned, it showed that‘Dawn Seedless’,‘Rizamat’and ‘Zhengzhou Zaoyu’varieties had higher value of diurnal mean of Pn, WUE, AQY, CE, LSP, CSP and lower value of LCP, CCP than those of other varieties, thereby more adap ted to Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation greenhouse cultivation.
Keywords:Grapevine  Variety  Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation  Photosynthetic characteristics
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《园艺学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《园艺学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号