首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Factors driving natural regeneration beneath a planted urban forest
Institution:1. School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Yale University, 360 Prospect St., New Haven, CT 06511 USA;2. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, New York City Urban Field Station, 431 Walter Reed Rd., Bayside, NY 11359, USA;1. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 180 E. Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, United States;2. General Directorate of Forestry, Southwest Anatolia Forest Research Institute, Antalya, 07010, Turkey;1. Sodefor, Cote d''Ivoire;2. Institut National Polytechnique Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Cote d''Ivoire;3. Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé, Cote d''Ivoire;4. Ministè re des Eaux et Forêts, Cote d''Ivoire;5. Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Cote d''Ivoire;6. Cirad, France;7. Université de Montpellier, France;1. Estación de Biología Chamela, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 21, San Patricio-Melaque, Jalisco 48980, Mexico;2. Facultad de Biología, R Building, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Ciudad Universitaria, Francisco J. Múgica S/N, Colonia Felicitas del Río, Morelia 58030, Mexico;3. Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico;4. Red de Ambiente y Sustentabilidad, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Carretera Antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, Xalapa 91070, Veracruz, Mexico;5. Museo de Zoología, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-399, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico;6. Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Ciudad Universitaria 3000, C.P. 04360, Coyoacán, Distrito Federal, Mexico;1. Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan;2. Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan;1. Graduate School of Technology, Industrial and Social Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan;2. Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan;3. Faculty of Bio-environmental Science, Kyoto Gakuen University, Kameoka, Kyoto 621-0022, Japan;1. Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States;2. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8524, United States
Abstract:Cities around the world are investing in urban forest plantings as a form of green infrastructure. The aim is that these plantations will develop into naturally-regenerating native forest stands. However, woody plant recruitment is often cited as the most limiting factor to creating self-sustaining urban forests. As such, there is interest in site treatments that promote recruitment of native woody species and simultaneously suppress woody non-native recruitment. We tested how three, common site treatments—compost, nurse shrubs, and tree species composition (six-species vs. two-species)—affected woody plant recruitment in 54 experimental plots beneath a large-scale tree planting within a high-traffic urban park. We identified naturally regenerating seedling and sapling species and measured their abundance six-years after the site was planted. This enabled us to examine initial recruitment dynamics (i.e. seedlings) and gain a better understanding of seedling success as they transition to the midstory (i.e. saplings). Seedling and sapling recruitment (native and total) was greater in areas with higher canopy cover. The combination of the nurse shrub treatment with compost and species composition (six-species) treatments increased seedling recruitment by 47% and 156%, respectively; however, the nurse shrub treatment by itself decreased seedling recruitment by 5% and native seedling recruitment by 35%. The compost treatment alone had no effect on the total number of recruits but resulted in 76% more non-native seedlings. The sizes of these treatment effects were strongly dependent on whether the forest plantings were in open areas, versus areas with existing tree canopy, the latter condition facilitating recruitment. Our findings therefore suggest that combinations of site treatments, paired with broad canopy tree species, may be most effective for promoting regeneration of native species resulting in more self-sustaining urban forests.
Keywords:Afforestation  Compost  Invasive species  New York city  Recruitment  Reforestation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号