首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

黄土坡面结皮对土壤水稳性团聚体的稳定性和可蚀性的影响
引用本文:陈琳,王健,宋鹏帅,赵宇,马玉红.黄土坡面结皮对土壤水稳性团聚体的稳定性和可蚀性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(18):87-92.
作者姓名:陈琳  王健  宋鹏帅  赵宇  马玉红
作者单位:1.西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所,陕西杨凌 712100;2.西北农林科技大学资源与环境学院,陕西杨凌 712100;3.西安市水利水土保持工作总站,西安 710000
基金项目:国家自然科学基金“坡耕地微地形水力连通性及入渗机理研究”(41771308);“生态恢复背景下黄土丘陵区土壤抗冲性基本规律研究”(41561058)
摘    要:为了探析微地形下土壤受雨滴打击后产生的结皮类型及团聚体组成差异。通过人工模拟降雨,研究坡面不同位置的结皮土壤水稳性团聚体分布特征、稳定性以及土壤可蚀性的变化情况。结果表明:(1)土壤水稳性团聚体以大团聚体(粒径>0.25 mm)含量为指标,原状土、结构结皮、沉积结皮、过渡带结皮>0.25 mm粒级的水稳性团聚体分别占37.28%、43.58%、36.69%、40.34%;(2)以降雨历时5 min为例,原状土、结构结皮、沉积结皮、过渡带结皮的水稳性团聚体的破坏率分别为:51.49%、46.00%、62.76%、51.02%;(3)原状土、结构结皮、沉积结皮、过渡带结皮的水稳性团聚体的平均重量直径分别为:0.15、0.20、0.14、0.17 mm;(4)原状土、结构结皮、沉积结皮、过渡带结皮土壤可蚀性K值的大小分别为:0.223、0.200、0.229、0.205。微地形下产生结皮差异使得水稳性团聚体分布有所区别,因此土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性和可蚀性存在差异。

关 键 词:土壤团聚体  土壤可蚀性  Yoder湿筛法  结皮类型  人工模拟降雨  微地形  
收稿时间:2019-03-15

Loess Slope Crust: Effects on the Stability and Erodibility of Soil Water-stable Aggregates
Chen Lin,Wang Jian,Song Pengshuai,Zhao Yu,Ma Yuhong.Loess Slope Crust: Effects on the Stability and Erodibility of Soil Water-stable Aggregates[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2020,36(18):87-92.
Authors:Chen Lin  Wang Jian  Song Pengshuai  Zhao Yu  Ma Yuhong
Institution:1.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling Shaanxi 712100;2.College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling Shaanxi 712100;3.Xi’an Water Conservancy and Soil Conservation General Station, Xi’an 710000
Abstract:The paper aims to explore the crust types and the aggregates composition differences in micro-topographic soil attacked by raindrops. We studied the distribution characteristics, stability and soil erodibility of crust soil water-stable aggregates at different locations on slopes by simulated rainfall. The results showed that: (1) the water-stable aggregates of undisturbed soil, structural crust, sedimentary crust, transitional zone crust>0.25 mm were 37.28%, 43.58%, 36.69% and 40.34%, respectively; (2) taking the rainfall for 5 min as an example, the PAD of water-stable aggregates of undisturbed soil, structural crust, sedimentary crust and transitional zone crust were 51.49%, 46.00%, 62.76%, 51.02%, respectively; (3) the MWD of water-stable aggregates of undisturbed soil, structural crust, sedimentary crust and transitional zone crust were 0.15, 0.20, 0.14, 0.17 mm, respectively; (4) the erodibility K values of undisturbed soil, structural crust, sedimentary crust and transitional zone crust were 0.223, 0.200, 0.229, 0.205, respectively. The crust differences under micro-topography make the distribution of water-stable aggregates different, so the stability and erodibility of soil water-stable aggregates are different.
Keywords:soil aggregates  soil erodibility  Yoder wet screening  crust types  simulated rainfall  micro-topography  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号