首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Visual preference of trees: The effects of tree attributes and seasons
Affiliation:1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, Beijing, 100083, China;2. National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing, 100083, China;3. Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing, 100083, China;4. Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100083, China;5. School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China;1. College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong, 271018, China;2. College of Foreign Languages, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong, 271018, China;3. Forestry College, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong, 271018, China;1. Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States;2. Tennessee Department of Agriculture, Division of Forestry, Sevierville, TN, United States
Abstract:Trees in cities are often viewed as objects of attraction. Previous literature suggests that some tree attributes, such as height, canopy size and leaf color, are the driving factors for a tree’s aesthetic quality. However, the tree attributes used greatly vary among researchers who do not reach an agreement on which attributes affect people’s preferences. Also, differences of trees’ aesthetic quality in different seasons are poorly understood. To fill these gaps, twenty tree species were photographed in the exact same location in different seasonal stages, their aesthetic quality was judged by the general public using semi-quantitative response variable, and 11 tree attributes were abstracted and quantified to check their effect on the perception of trees’ beauty. Statistical analysis showed that the tree possessing the characteristics of higher branching trunk, dense canopy and moderate length of leaves (about 11 cm) was given a high preference rank. Although there is no significant difference among preference scores in four seasons, the tree ranked a high preference in spring or summer was more likely to indicate an intense fluctuation of preference among four seasons. The practical implication is that more tree species with the preferred attributes should be used not only for aesthetic appeal but also for ecological benefits. For the contrast of aesthetic quality in different seasons, the trees which rank as high preference in spring or summer should be planted.
Keywords:Green space design  Landscape assessment  Perception  Visual aesthetic quality
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号