首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于多元非线性空间建模的拉萨河流域沟蚀发生风险探测
引用本文:李建军,陈玉兰,焦菊英,陈同德,陈一先,赵文婷,赵春敬,尚天赦,简金世,曹雪.基于多元非线性空间建模的拉萨河流域沟蚀发生风险探测[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(17):73-82.
作者姓名:李建军  陈玉兰  焦菊英  陈同德  陈一先  赵文婷  赵春敬  尚天赦  简金世  曹雪
作者单位:1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所,黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,杨凌 712100;;2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,杨凌 712100;;1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所,黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,杨凌 712100; 2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,杨凌 712100;;1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所,黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,杨凌 712100; 3. 青海民族大学政治与公共管理学院,西宁 810007;;2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,杨凌 712100; 4. 西北大学城市与环境学院,西安 710127;;1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所,黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,杨凌 712100; 5. 黄河水利科学研究院,郑州 450003;
基金项目:第二次青藏高原综合考察研究(2019QZKK0603);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA20040202)
摘    要:青藏高原的生态环境面临着气候变暖和人类活动增加的双重压力,增加了土壤侵蚀风险。沟蚀是土壤侵蚀最为剧烈的表现形式,为调查当地沟蚀现状和主控因素,该研究选择拉萨河流域作为代表,通过野外调查和遥感解译建立2 171个样点,并首次基于最优尺度回归、地理探测器和两者的组合共4种方法对15个影响沟蚀的因子及其分级/分类的重要性和沟蚀发生风险进行了探测。结果发现:1)在最优尺度回归中,因子系数前三位分别为海拔(0.442)、土壤类型(0.168)和归一化植被指数(0.156);在地理探测器中,海拔(0.263)、土壤类型(0.251)和人类足迹(0.174)排在前三位。2)最优尺度回归和地理探测器的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(Area Under the Curve,AUC)值分别为0.899和0.833,两种组合方法AUC值分别为0.866和0.848,各方法探测效果均良好,都适用于空间建模。3)拉萨河流域有9.52%~13.97%的区域有着非常高的沟蚀风险,主要集中在拉萨河下游河谷两岸和当雄盆地等相对低海拔地区。研究结果可为青藏高原生态安全屏障建设和水土保持工作提供参考。

关 键 词:沟蚀  遥感  空间建模  最优尺度回归  地理探测器  青藏高原
收稿时间:2022/7/24 0:00:00
修稿时间:2022/8/25 0:00:00

Detecting gully occurrence risks using multivariate nonlinear spatial modeling in the Lhasa River Basin of China
Li Jianjun,Chen Yulan,Jiao Juying,Chen Tongde,Chen Yixian,Zhao Wenting,Zhao Chunjing,Shang Tianshe,Jian Jinshi,Cao Xue.Detecting gully occurrence risks using multivariate nonlinear spatial modeling in the Lhasa River Basin of China[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2022,38(17):73-82.
Authors:Li Jianjun  Chen Yulan  Jiao Juying  Chen Tongde  Chen Yixian  Zhao Wenting  Zhao Chunjing  Shang Tianshe  Jian Jinshi  Cao Xue
Institution:1. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China;;2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resource, Yangling 712100, China;;1. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; 2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resource, Yangling 712100, China;;1. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; 3. School of Politics and Public Administration, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining 810007, China;;2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resource, Yangling 712100, China; 4. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi''an 710127, China;;1. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China; 5. Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Zhengzhou 450003, China;
Abstract:The risk of soil erosion is ever increasing in the Tibetan Plateau, due to the ecological environment under climate warming and human activities. Among them, gully erosion has been the most severe type of soil erosion. Taking the Lhasa River Basin of China as a sample, this study aims to detect the gully occurrence risk using multivariate nonlinear spatial modeling. 2171 gully points were selected to determine the controlling factors of gully erosion using the field survey and remote sensing interpretation. Gully points were set as the value of 1, whereas, no gully point was the value of 0. The Categorical Regression (CATREG), Geodetector, and their combination were utilized to quantify and classify the importance of 15 factors for the risk map of gully occurrence. The 15 factors were the elevation, slope, aspect, topographic position index, topographic wetness index, topographic relief, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), lithology, soil type, permafrost thermal stability, land use, human footprint, distance to the residential area, distance to the river and mean annual precipitation, all of which passed the collinearity test before modeling. Continuous numerical variables were also converted to the type variables by means of discretization. Eight classes were divided by the Jenks Natural Breaks Classification, except for nine classes of aspect. All key factors were converted to the 12.5 m resolution raster datasets. The factor datasets of all sample points were extracted by multi-value extraction to point tool of ArcGIS 10.2 software for data analysis. The Geodetector was run in the Excel software. The factor and risk detectors were used as two parameters of the binary statistical model. The CATREG was performed on the SPSS20 software. The fitting parameters were obtained, including the factor coefficient, and each class of factors. The improved model was executed in the Raster Calculator Tool in ArcGIS to obtain the map of gully occurrence risk. Finally, the goodness of fit of each was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The results showed that: 1) The top three factor coefficients in the CATREG were the elevation (0.442), soil type (0.168), and NDVI (0.156). By contrast, the elevation (0.263), soil type (0.251), and human footprint (0.174) were the top three among the Geodetector. 2) The regression performed the best (AUC=0.899), followed by the two combined methods (AUC=0.866/0.848). But, the Geodetector performed relatively poorly (AUC=0.833). All these methods were suitable for spatial modeling in this case. Only a relatively few influences were found in the classification number of factors on the modeling performance. Correspondingly, the classification number with the highest q value of each factor in the Geodetector can be explored to improve the modeling accuracy in the future. In addition, the quantitative score or frequency of adjacent grade can be considered for the grade of sample deficiency. 3) About 9.52% to 13.97% of the Lhasa River Basin was at a very high risk of gully occurrence, mainly distributed in the lower Lhasa River valley and Damxung Basin. 91% of the very high risk areas were clustered in the elevation classes 1-3, whereas, 79% of the high risk areas were clustered in the elevation classes 2-5. Therefore, the hydrological connectivity can be altered to restore the vegetation for less topsoil disturbance in the low-elevation area around large towns. The high-elevation area with a low risk can be used to prevent overgrazing and vegetation destruction because of the high precipitation in the northeast of the basin. The finding can provide a strong reference to construct the ecological security barrier, as well as the soil and water conservation on the Tibetan Plateau.
Keywords:gully erosion  remote sensing  spatial modeling  Categorical Regression  Geodetector  Tibetan Plateau
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号