首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

桑干河流域淤地坝沉积泥沙特征及其来源解析
引用本文:谢骁健,苏正安,周涛,王丽娟,周铃.桑干河流域淤地坝沉积泥沙特征及其来源解析[J].水土保持学报,2024,38(1):49-59.
作者姓名:谢骁健  苏正安  周涛  王丽娟  周铃
作者单位:1. 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 中国科学院山地表生过程与生态调控重点实验室, 成都 610041;2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(42277338);第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0307);四川省科技计划项目(2022YFS0500)
摘    要:目的]为查明桑干河流域的泥沙主要策源地和侵蚀产沙变化。方法]选取阳原县高墙乡典型淤地坝沉积泥沙为研究对象,利用复合指纹识别技术,测定沉积泥沙及其源地的土壤粒径、SOC、TN、137Cs、低频质量磁化率等9种指纹因子,研究了不同淤积阶段的泥沙策源地及坝控小流域侵蚀产沙演变规律。结果](1)沉积泥沙中137Cs平均含量较低,与沟壁土壤无显著差异(p>0.05),但极显著小于林草地和耕地的137Cs含量(p<0.01),这指示淤地坝沉积泥沙主要来源于沟壁;(2)由于沟壁中大部分137Cs含量低于检出限,137Cs较好地指示泥沙主要来源沟谷地中的沟壁,但难以用于小流域多种策源地的判别,经Kruskal-Wallis H非参数检验和多元逐步判别分析筛选,确定TN+Xlfb+SOC构成最佳指纹因子组合,有效地判别小流域2006—2017年泥沙源地的平均贡献率为沟壁(82.68%±8.20%)>耕地(15.36%±8.46%)>林草地(1....

关 键 词:复合指纹识别技术  侵蚀变化  泥沙来源  淤地坝  沉积旋回
收稿时间:2023/7/17 0:00:00
修稿时间:2023/8/17 0:00:00

Sediment Characteristics and Sources Tracing of Warping Dam in Sanggan River Basin
XIE Xiaojian,SU Zheng''an,ZHOU Tao,WANG Lijuan,ZHOU Ling.Sediment Characteristics and Sources Tracing of Warping Dam in Sanggan River Basin[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2024,38(1):49-59.
Authors:XIE Xiaojian  SU Zheng'an  ZHOU Tao  WANG Lijuan  ZHOU Ling
Institution:1. Key Laboratory of Mountain Surface Processes and Ecological Regulation, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China;2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract:Objective] This study intends to explore the main source of sediment and the evolution of erosion and sediment yield in Sanggan River Basin. Methods] A typical warping dam in Gaoqiang Township, Yangyuan County was selected as the research object. The composite fingerprint identification technology was used to determine nine fingerprint factors, including soil particle size, SOC, TN, radionuclide (137Cs) and low-frequency magnetic susceptibility, of sediment and its source areas. The evolution patterns of erosion and sediment production in different sedimentation stages of sediment source areas and dam controlled small watersheds were studied. Results] (1) The average content of 137Cs in sediment was relatively low, and it was not significantly different from that of gully wall soil, but it was extremely significantly lower than that of forest-grasslands and croplands soil (p<0.01), which indicated that the sediment was mainly from gully wall. (2) As the majority of 137Cs content of gully wall was below the detection limit, 137Cs was a good indicator for identifying gully wall as the main sediment source but it was difficult to be used for distinguishing multiple sediment sources in the small basin. Through Kruskal-Wallis H nonparametric test and multiple stepwise discriminant analysis screening, the optimal combination of fingerprint factors was TN+Xlfb+SOC, which effectively distinguished the average contribution rate of sediment source areas in small watersheds from 2006 to 2017. The contribution rate followed the order of gully wall (82.68%±8.20%) > croplands (15.36%±8.46%) > forest-grasslands (1.96%±0.33%). (3) In the evolution of erosion and sediment yield, gully wall was the main sediment contribution area for a long time, forest-grasslands had weak response to erosive rainfall, and the sediment contribution rate of croplands increased significantly when extreme rainstorm occurred. Conclusion] Overall, the 137Cs tracing technique was suitable for identifying the main sediment source in the small basin, and the composite fingerprint technique was better at identifying multiple sediment sources. The collapse of gully walls caused by gully erosion was the main cause of severe soil erosion in the Sanggan River Basin.
Keywords:composite fingerprinting technique|erosion changes|sediment sources|warping dam|sedimentary cycle
点击此处可从《水土保持学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水土保持学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号