首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

黄淮海夏玉米机械化粒收质量及其主要影响因素
引用本文:王克如,李璐璐,鲁镇胜,高尚,王浥州,黄兆福,谢瑞芝,明博,侯鹏,薛军,张镇涛,侯梁宇,李少昆.黄淮海夏玉米机械化粒收质量及其主要影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(7):1-7.
作者姓名:王克如  李璐璐  鲁镇胜  高尚  王浥州  黄兆福  谢瑞芝  明博  侯鹏  薛军  张镇涛  侯梁宇  李少昆
作者单位:1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/农业农村部作物生理生态重点实验室,北京 100081;;2. 河南省漯河市农机推广服务中心,漯河 462000;;3. 中国农业大学资源与环境学院,北京 100193;
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300101, 2016YFD03001010);国家自然科学基金项目(31371575);国家玉米产业技术体系项目(CARS-02-25);中国农业科学院科技创新项目
摘    要:针对黄淮海夏玉米区机械粒收质量差及其主要影响因素不明确,该研究选择黄淮海夏玉米区2013-2019年机械粒收技术联合试验示范的1 250组测试样本进行籽粒含水率、破碎率、杂质率和损失率等粒收质量统计分析,结果表明,夏玉米机械粒收时籽粒含水率平均为27.38%,破碎率平均为9.29%,杂质率平均为1.68%,损失率平均为3.28%,籽粒含水率和破碎率明显高于全国平均值。从不同年份收获质量看,2018、2019年收获籽粒平均含水率下降至25.45%和25.05%,平均破碎率下降至9.07%和7.88%,虽仍然高出国家玉米机械收获规定的破碎率标准(≤5%)的要求,但收获质量已发生明显改善。破碎率与收获期籽粒含水率之间呈二次曲线关系,破碎率最低时籽粒含水率为21.08%。因此,破碎率高仍然是黄淮海夏玉米机械粒收存在的主要质量问题,而收获期籽粒含水率高是导致破碎率高、制约机械粒收的主要原因。针对黄淮海夏播区热量资源梯度分布差异较大,玉米收获季节窗口期短的特点,选择早熟、脱水快的品种,进行品种脱水与区域气候资源配置,进一步降低收获期籽粒含水率,规范宜机械粒收栽培技术以及收获机操作规程是破解黄淮海夏玉米粒收质量差的关键。

关 键 词:机械化  作物  夏玉米  机械粒收  收获质量  品种  热量资源
收稿时间:2020/9/3 0:00:00
修稿时间:2021/1/17 0:00:00

Mechanized grain harvesting quality of summer maize and its major influencing factors in Huanghuaihai region of China
Wang Keru,Li Lulu,Lu Zhensheng,Gao Shang,Wang Yizhou,Huang Zhaofu,Xie Ruizhi,Ming Bo,Hou Peng,Xue Jun,Zhang Zhentao,Hou Liangyu,Li Shaokun.Mechanized grain harvesting quality of summer maize and its major influencing factors in Huanghuaihai region of China[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2021,37(7):1-7.
Authors:Wang Keru  Li Lulu  Lu Zhensheng  Gao Shang  Wang Yizhou  Huang Zhaofu  Xie Ruizhi  Ming Bo  Hou Peng  Xue Jun  Zhang Zhentao  Hou Liangyu  Li Shaokun
Institution:1. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China;;2. Agricultural Machinery Extension Service Center of Luohe, Luohe 462000, China;;3. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
Abstract:Huanghuaihai Summer Maize Region (HSMR) is one of the most difficult harvesting areas in the world, particularly in terms of mechanical grain harvesting. In this study, a multi-point experiment was therefore conducted in the HSMR to assess the influencing factors for better implementation of mechanical grain harvesting. 1 250 groups of field test datasets were collected, including 20 harvester types and 420 maize varieties, for the grain quality after mechanical harvesting between 2013 and 2019. The harvesting quality of maize grain was determined using the moisture content, breakage rate, impurity rate, and harvest losses from fallen ears and grain. The results show that the moisture content of grain ranged from 11.13% to 44.60%, with an average of 27.38% for the summer maize harvested by a combine harvester. The breakage rate of grain ranged from 1.11% to 33.94%, with an average of 9.29%. The impurity rate ranged from 0 to 12.25%, with an average of 1.68%. The harvest yield loss rate ranged from 0 to 79.82%, with an average of 3.28%. The average moisture content and breakage rate of grain were significantly higher than the national average values. The average moisture contents of grain at harvest were 25.45%, and 25.05% in 2018 and 2019, respectively, whereas, the average breakage rates of grain were 9.07% and 7.88%, respectively. Although the average breakage rate of grain in the HSMR was still higher than the Chinese national standard (5%), the harvest quality had significantly improved since 2013. There was a quadratic relationship between the breakage rate and moisture content of grain at harvest. The minimum breakage rate occurred at the grain moisture content of 21.08%. A high breakage rate of grain was currently the main quality issue to restrict the application of mechanical harvesting in this region, due mostly to the high moisture content of grain at harvest. The average impurity rate met the national standard of 3%, whereas, the average harvest yield loss rate met the national standard of 5%. Nevertheless, the impurity rate of more than 3% was 17.07% of samples, and the harvest yield loss rate of more than 5% was 19.05% of samples. The grain loss accounted for 28.70% of the total loss, and the ear loss accounted for 71.30%. The harvest loss from fallen ears contributed to the main part of harvest loss. There was a large difference in the number of falling ears in the experimental fields, with a variation coefficient of 235.22%. The proportion of maize varieties suitable for mechanical harvesting tended to increase over the study period, indicating better agreement with the continuous decrease in the grain moisture content, breakage rate, impurity rate, and harvest loss rate. Additionally, the yield remained unchanged over the study period. The grain moisture content and breakage rate clearly represented the heat resources with a gradual decrease from south to north, indicating the highest in the north, the second-highest in the middle, and the lowest in the southern region. Consequently, the optimal selection varieties with early maturity and fast dehydration can contribute to reducing the grain moisture content at harvest under the regional climate in the HSMR. Alternatively, an appropriate maize grain harvesting machine with a low grain breakage rate can also be expected to enhance the harvest quality, with emphasis on the high crushing-resistant maize varieties, cultivation technology, and operating procedures of a harvester, even harvesting at the appropriate time.
Keywords:mechanization  crop  summer maize  mechanical grain harvest  harvest quality  varieties  heat resources  countermeasures
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业工程学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号