首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina
Authors:Email author" target="_blank">Romina?P?SuárezEmail author  Maria?E?Zaccagnini  Kimberly?J?Babbitt  Noela?C?Calamari  Guillermo?S?Natale  Alexis?Cerezo  Nadia?Codugnello  Teresa?Boca  Maria?J?Damonte  Josefina?Vera-Candioti  Gregorio?I?Gavier-Pizarro
Institution:1.Biodiversidad, Ecología y Gestión Ambiental en Agroecosistemas (BIOEGA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos (IRB), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA),Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CNIA),Buenos Aires,Argentina;2.Department of Natural Resources and the Environment,University of New Hampshire,Durham,USA;3.Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), EEA Paraná,Factores Bióticos y Protección Vegetal,Entre Ríos,Argentina;4.Asociación Aves Argentinas,Buenos Aires,Argentina;5.Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos, Facultad de Agronomía,Universidad de Buenos Aires,Buenos Aires,Argentina;6.Laboratorio de Ecología,Universidad Nacional de Luján,Buenos Aires,Argentina;7.Centro de Investigaciones del Medio Ambiente, Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas,Universidad Nacional de La Plata,Buenos Aires,Argentina;8.Instituto de Clima y Agua, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (INTA),Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CNIA),Buenos Aires,Argentina;9.Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) A.E.R.,Venado Tuerto,Argentina;10.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET),Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires,Argentina
Abstract:

Context

Amphibians are declining worldwide and land use change to agriculture is recognized as a leading cause. Argentina is undergoing an agriculturalization process with rapid changes in landscape structure.

Objectives

We evaluated anuran response to landscape composition and configuration in two landscapes of east-central Argentina with different degrees of agriculturalization. We identified sensitive species and evaluated landscape influence on communities and individual species at two spatial scales.

Methods

We compared anuran richness, frequency of occurrence, and activity between landscapes using call surveys data from 120 sampling points from 2007 to 2009. We evaluated anuran responses to landscape structure variables estimated within 250 and 500-m radius buffers using canonical correspondence analysis and multimodel inference from a set of candidate models.

Results

Anuran richness was lower in the landscape with greater level of agriculturalization with reduced amount of forest cover and stream length. This pattern was driven by the lower occurrence and calling activity of seven out of the sixteen recorded species. Four species responded positively to the amount of forest cover and stream habitat. Three species responded positively to forest cohesion and negatively to rural housing. Two responded negatively to crop area and diversity of cover classes.

Conclusions

Anurans within agricultural landscapes of east-central Argentina are responding to landscape structure. Responses varied depending on species and study scale. Life-history traits contribute to responses differences. Our study offers a better understanding of landscape effects on anurans and can be used for land management in other areas experiencing a similar agriculturalization process.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号