首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

褐飞虱和白背飞虱在抗褐飞虱水稻品种上的行为反应
引用本文:朱麟,古德祥,张古忍,游金平.褐飞虱和白背飞虱在抗褐飞虱水稻品种上的行为反应[J].植物保护学报,2002,29(2):145-152.
作者姓名:朱麟  古德祥  张古忍  游金平
作者单位:1. 南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院,南京,210037
2. 中山大学昆虫学研究所,生物防治国家重点实验室,广州,510275
3. 贵州省林业科学院森林保护研究所,贵阳,550011
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(39770514),广东省自然科学基金(980297)
摘    要:以ASD7、IR36、粳籼89(JX89)、Mudgo四个抗褐飞虱水稻品种和感性品种TN1为材料,比较了褐飞虱和白背飞虱在这些品种上的行为反应。褐飞虱对抗性品种表现出明显的非嗜好性。褐飞虱自4h、白背飞虱自8h以后,各品种上的着虫量与TN1差异显著,而其它各品种上的虫量无明显差异(Mudgo除外)。白背飞虱选择各抗性品种的百分率明显大于褐飞虱(Mudgo除外);同一水稻品种上的稻飞虱数量无时间上的规律性。两种稻飞虱在抗性品种和TN1上的取食量差异显著。取食同一品种时,白背飞虱在IR36、JX89上的取食量大于褐飞虱,且相互间差异显著。两种稻飞虱在四个抗性品种上的取食痕数量明显多于TN1;两种飞虱在ASD7和JX89上的取食痕数量差异显著,白背飞虱的数量明显少于褐飞虱。在所有水稻品种上的取食痕数量与取食量呈明显的负相关关系。

关 键 词:褐飞虱  白背飞虱  抗褐飞虱水稻品种  行为反应

Behavioral responses of brown planthopper and white-backed planthopper to BPH-resistant rice varieties
Zhu Lin,Gu Dexiang,Zhang Guren and You Jinping.Behavioral responses of brown planthopper and white-backed planthopper to BPH-resistant rice varieties[J].Acta Phytophylacica Sinica,2002,29(2):145-152.
Authors:Zhu Lin  Gu Dexiang  Zhang Guren and You Jinping
Institution:Institute of Entomology, the State Key Lab for Biological Control, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275,Institute of Entomology, the State Key Lab for Biological Control, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275,Institute of Entomology, the State Key Lab for Biological Control, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275 and Institute of Forest Protection, Guizhou Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550011
Abstract:Comparisons among the behavioral reactions of brown planthopper ( BPH) Nilaparvata lu-gens Stal and white-backed planthopper (WBPH) Sogatella furcifera (Horvath) fed on four BPH-resistant (ASD7, IR36, JX89 and Mudgo) and one BPH-susceptible (TN1) rice varieties were conducted . BPH showed evident non-preference reaction to these resistant varieties, and there were significant differences between BPH (4h after inoculation)/WBPH (8h after inoculation) densities on resistant and susceptible varieties, while the planthopper densities on BPH-resistant varieties, except Mudgo, were similar. On the same BPH-resistant variety, the preference rate on WBPH were significantly higher than that of BPH. There was no time regularity of planthopper density on any rice variety. Both the feeding amounts of BPH and WBPH on resistant varieties were markedly lower than those on TN1, while in comparison with the feeding amounts of BPH on IR36/JX89, those of WBPH were obviously higher. Contrarily, the probing wound number of the two planthopper species on resistant rice varieties were much more than that on TN1, but those of WBPH on ASD7/JX89 were much less than those of BPH. Consequently, there is a negative correlation between the probing wound number and feeding amount of planthopper on any rice variety.
Keywords:Nilaparvata lugens  Sogatella furcifera  BPH-resistant rice variety  behavioral response  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《植物保护学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《植物保护学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号