首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

微咸水与淡水轮灌对春玉米土壤CO2和N2O排放的影响
引用本文:王帅杰,杨培岭,苏艳平,商放泽,魏琛琛,任树梅.微咸水与淡水轮灌对春玉米土壤CO2和N2O排放的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(10):41-48.
作者姓名:王帅杰  杨培岭  苏艳平  商放泽  魏琛琛  任树梅
作者单位:中国农业大学水利与土木工程学院;清华大学土木水利学院
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51679239)
摘    要:为探究咸淡轮灌模式下春玉米土壤温室气体的排放特性,采用4种水质,即淡水和矿化度分别为2、3.5和5g/L的微咸水;2种轮灌方式,即淡水—微咸水(1∶1)和淡水—微咸水—微咸水(1∶2)循环轮灌进行滴灌试验,分析了不同处理对农田土壤CO_2、N_2O排放和春玉米产量的影响。结果表明:1)1:2轮灌处理CO_2和N_2O日平均排放通量比1∶1轮灌分别低10.26%、8.74%。2)矿化度为3.5和5g/L微咸水处理CO_2气体日均排放通量比2g/L分别低27.82%、31.16%,N_2O气体日平均排放通量比2g/L分别低4.46%、8.23%。3)相比2g/L处理,3.5和5g/L处理产量平均减少5.92%、11.05%;1∶2轮灌比1∶1轮灌产量平均减少2.00%。4)显著性分析表明:水质对CO_2气体日平均排放通量和玉米产量的影响显著(P0.05),对N_2O气体排放通量无显著影响(P0.05);轮灌方式对CO_2、N_2O气体排放通量和玉米产量的影响不显著(P0.05)。

关 键 词:玉米  微咸水  轮灌  CO2  N2O  土壤
收稿时间:2018/1/18 0:00:00

Effects of alternative irrigation between brackish water and fresh water on CO2 and N2O emission from spring maize soil
WANG Shuaijie,YANG Peiling,SU Yanping,SHANG Fangze,WEI Chenchen and REN Shumei.Effects of alternative irrigation between brackish water and fresh water on CO2 and N2O emission from spring maize soil[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2018,23(10):41-48.
Authors:WANG Shuaijie  YANG Peiling  SU Yanping  SHANG Fangze  WEI Chenchen and REN Shumei
Institution:College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China,College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China,College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China,School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China,College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China and College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract:In order to investigate the influences of alternative irrigation between brackish water and fresh water on greenhouse gas emission from spring maize soil, drip irrigation experiments with four kinds of water quality and two different irrigation methods were conducted. The results showed that:The average daily emission of CO2 and N2O flux of 1:2 alternative irrigation were respectively reduced by 10.26% and 8.74% compared with that of 1:1 alternative irrigation. The average emission of CO2 and N2O flux were 27.82% and 31.16% lower than that of 2.0 g/L and the average emissions flux of N2O gas were 4.46% and 8.23% lower than that of 2.0 g/L, respectively. Compared to 2.0 g/L brackish water treatment, the corn yield of 3.5 g/L and 5.0 g/L treatment respectively decreased by 5.92% and 11.05% on average. The corn yield of 1:2 alternative irrigation treatment was 2.00% lower than that of 1:1 on average. The results significant difference analysis showed that:The water quality had a significant effect on the daily average emission of CO2 flux and maize yield (P<0.05), whereas the water quality did not have significant effects on N2O emission flux (P>0.05); The effect of alternative irrigation on CO2 and N2O emission fluxes and maize yield were not significant (P >0.05).
Keywords:maize  brackish water  alternative irrigation  CO2  N2O  soil
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农业大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农业大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号