首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States
Authors:Frederick Cubbage  Patricio Mac Donagh  José Sawinski Júnior  Rafael Rubilar  Pablo Donoso  Arnaldo Ferreira  Vitor Hoeflich  Virginia Morales Olmos  Gustavo Ferreira  Gustavo Balmelli  Jacek Siry  Mirta Noemi Báez  José Alvarez
Institution:(1) Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8008, USA;(2) Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina;(3) Universidade do Contestado-Canoinhas, Canoinhas, Brazil;(4) Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile;(5) Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile;(6) Consultant, Forest Genetics, Los Angeles, CA, USA;(7) Embrapa Florestas and Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Brazil Curitiba, Brazil;(8) Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Tacuarembo, Uruguay;(9) University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA;(10) CMPC Forestry, Concepción, Chile
Abstract:Timber investment returns were estimated for the principal exotic and selected native species in the Southern Cone of Latin America and in the Southern United States. Exotic eucalyptus plantations in South America were most profitable, with internal rates of returns (IRRs) ranging from 13% to 23%, followed by exotic loblolly pine, with IRRs from 9% to 17%. Average loblolly pine plantation returns in the US South were less profitable, with an IRR of about 9.5%, and natural forest management in the South had IRRs of 4% to 8%. Subtropical native species plantations of the best araucaria and nothofagus species had reasonable financial returns, with IRRs ranging from 5% to 13%. Subtropical or tropical native forests had fewer commercial timber species, and had much lower growth rates and returns. Their IRRs were less than 4%, or even negative for unmanaged stands. State subsidy payments for forest plantations or for timber stand improvements increased IRRs somewhat and reserving areas for environmental protection reduced their IRRs slightly. Including land costs in the cash flows decreased these internal rates of return substantially. Natural stand returns in Latin America were much less than those of plantations, but management of those stands offered better rates of return than only holding the land.
Keywords:Financial analyses  Forest plantations  Native forests  Latin America  Biological and financial risk
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号