| 不同发酵剂对牛羊屠宰粪便发酵效果的比较不同发酵剂对牛羊屠宰粪便发酵效果的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陆艳,蔡其刚,王戈平,马君毅,叶成玉,牛小迎,唐玉春,马利青.不同发酵剂对牛羊屠宰粪便发酵效果的比较不同发酵剂对牛羊屠宰粪便发酵效果的比较[J].青海畜牧兽医杂志,2010,40(2):17-19. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陆艳 蔡其刚 王戈平 马君毅 叶成玉 牛小迎 唐玉春 马利青 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 青海省畜牧兽医科学院,西宁,810016
2. 青海百德投资发展有限公司,810016 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 试验Ⅰ，试验Ⅱ，试验Ⅲ和对照4个组，分别利用A、B、C三种不同复合发酵菌剂，对牛羊屠宰粪便进行堆肥发酵，在发酵过程中比较了不同试验组的温度、水分、挥发性总固体、pH、细菌群落的变化，以及对牧草籽发芽率的影响。这些数据为进一步优势发酵菌荆的选择提供科学依据。
|
| 关 键 词： | 发酵菌剂 牛羊屠宰粪便 比较 |
Comparing Effect of Different Compound Bacterial on Manure Ferment of SlaughteredCattle and Sheep |
| |
| LU Yan et al.Comparing Effect of Different Compound Bacterial on Manure Ferment of SlaughteredCattle and Sheep[J].Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,2010,40(2):17-19. |
| |
| Authors: | LU Yan |
| |
| Institution: | LU Yan et al(Qinghai Academy of Animal , Veterinary Science,Xining,810016) |
| |
| Abstract: | Test Was designed as No. Ⅰgroup, No. Ⅱgroup, No.Ⅲgroup -and control group. Three kinds of different compound bacteria preparation, A, B, C were used for different test group, respectively. The manure of slaughtered cattle and sheep was fermented with A, B, C. The temperature, moisture, total volatile solids, PH, Variation of bacterial community and forage seeds impacting on germination were compared during fermentation. All these test data can sever as further screening dominant fermentation bacterial preparation. |
| |
| Keywords: | Fermentation bacterial preparation Slaughtered manure Comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
