首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

文章千古事 疑案相与析——蜂螫马案的举证责任之我见
引用本文:周贤森,周国君,陈素花.文章千古事 疑案相与析——蜂螫马案的举证责任之我见[J].蜜蜂杂志,2006,26(1):37-39.
作者姓名:周贤森  周国君  陈素花
作者单位:1. 福建省南安市政府法制办,福建,南安,362300
2. 国立华侨大学法学院,福建,泉州,362021
摘    要:无过错责任原则的责任构成要件只包括违法行为(侵权行为)、损害事实和因果关系3个构成要件.蜂螫马案属于饲养动物造成他人损害的特殊民事侵权案,适用无过错责任原则,实行举证责任倒置,由被告就原告有过错或者第三人有过错承担举证责任.但违法行为(侵权行为)、损害事实、因果关系的举证责任仍由原告承担,而非被告承担.

关 键 词:蜂螫马案  特殊民事侵权  举证责任  违法(侵权)行为  因果关系
文章编号:1003-9139(2006)01-0037-03
修稿时间:2005年12月5日

Our Different Opinions on the Burden of Proof of the Case of Bee Stinging Horse
ZHOU Xian-sen,ZHOU Gou-jun,CHEN Su-hua.Our Different Opinions on the Burden of Proof of the Case of Bee Stinging Horse[J].Journal of Bee,2006,26(1):37-39.
Authors:ZHOU Xian-sen  ZHOU Gou-jun  CHEN Su-hua
Abstract:The factors of the liability of the principle of no-fault liability only include three ones, offense or tort, the fact of damage, and causation. Since it belongs to the special tort in which the domesticated animal causes harm to person, the bee-stinging-horse case should be applied to the principle of no-fault liability and the principle of reversal of burden of proof and justification. That means while the defendant holds the burden to prove that the plaintiff or the third party is faulty, it is still the plaintiff, not the defendant, who is assumed to shoulder the duty to prove the existence of tort, the fact of damage and causation.
Keywords:the case of bee stinging horse  special tort  burden of proof  tort  causation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号