首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

宁波地区4种典型农村生活污水处理工艺污染物去除率比较分析
引用本文:周金波,包薇红,罗艳,李洋,金树权.宁波地区4种典型农村生活污水处理工艺污染物去除率比较分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,34(5):492-498.
作者姓名:周金波  包薇红  罗艳  李洋  金树权
作者单位:宁波市农业科学研究院生态环境研究所, 浙江 宁波 315040,宁波市环境科学保护设计研究院, 浙江 宁波 315012,宁波市环境科学保护设计研究院, 浙江 宁波 315012,宁波市农业科学研究院生态环境研究所, 浙江 宁波 315040,宁波市农业科学研究院生态环境研究所, 浙江 宁波 315040
基金项目:宁波市科技社发攻关项目(2014C50001)
摘    要:选择宁波地区的A/O一体化、生物滤池、生物转盘和人工湿地等4种典型农村生活污水处理工艺为研究对象,于2013年1月-2015年12月期间开展各工艺终端处理设施的进出水水质跟踪监测,进行各处理工艺的污染物去除率和稳定性比较分析。结果表明,4种处理工艺的COD、BOD5、SS多年平均去除率大小顺序均为A/O一体化 > 生物滤池 > 生物转盘 > 人工湿地,TN多年平均去除率大小顺序为生物滤池 > 生物转盘 > A/O一体化 > 人工湿地,其中A/O一体化、生物滤池和生物转盘工艺的COD、BOD5、TN 平均去除率均显著高于人工湿地工艺;A/O一体化、生物滤池和生物转盘工艺随着终端处理设施运行年限的延长,COD、BOD5、SS、TN去除率均保持稳定,而人工湿地工艺的COD、BOD5、TN去除率均呈现明显的下降趋势;各处理工艺在低温期(11月-次年4月)和高温期(5月-10月)的SS去除率差异不明显,但各处理工艺的COD、BOD5、TN去除率在低温期明显低于高温期,其中A/O一体化工艺差异相对较小,生物滤池工艺差异最大。

关 键 词:农村生活污水,处理工艺,处理效率
收稿时间:2017/5/12 0:00:00

Comparison and Analysis of Pollutant Removal Efficiency of Four Kinds of Typical Rural Domestic Sewage Treatment Technology in Ningbo Area, China
ZHOU Jin-bo,BAO Wei-hong,LUO Yan,LI Yang and JIN Shu-quan.Comparison and Analysis of Pollutant Removal Efficiency of Four Kinds of Typical Rural Domestic Sewage Treatment Technology in Ningbo Area, China[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science( J. Agro-Environ. Sci.),2017,34(5):492-498.
Authors:ZHOU Jin-bo  BAO Wei-hong  LUO Yan  LI Yang and JIN Shu-quan
Institution:Ecology and Environment Institute, Ningbo Academy of Agricultural Science, Ningbo 315040, China,Environmental Protection Research and Design Institute of Ningbo, Ningbo 315012, China,Environmental Protection Research and Design Institute of Ningbo, Ningbo 315012, China,Ecology and Environment Institute, Ningbo Academy of Agricultural Science, Ningbo 315040, China and Ecology and Environment Institute, Ningbo Academy of Agricultural Science, Ningbo 315040, China
Abstract:Comparison and analysis of pollutant removal efficiency and stability of 4 kinds of typical rural domestic sewage treatment technology, including A/O integrated equipment technology(A/O), biological aerated filter technology(BAF), rotating biological contactor technology(RBC), constructed wetland technology(CW), were investigated in Ningbo area from Jan 2013 to Dec 2015. The results indicated that, multi-year average removal efficiency of COD, BOD5, SS of 4 kinds of technology were in the sequence of A/O > BAF > RBC > CW, while multi-year average removal efficiency of TN was in the sequence of BAF > RBC > A/O > CW, among them the average removal efficiency of COD, BOD5, TN of A/O, BAF and RBC were significantly higher than that of CW. Removal efficiency of COD, BOD5, SS, TN of A/O, BAF and RBC were kept stable accompanied by extension of service period, but removal efficiency of COD, BOD5, TN of CW were decreased significantly accompanied by extension of service period. Removal efficiency of SS was little difference between low temperature period(Nov to Apr) and high temperature period(May to Oct), but removal efficiency of COD, BOD5, TN of low temperature period were significantly lower than that of high temperature, among them A/O was relatively insignificant, and BAF was the most.
Keywords:rural domestic sewage  treatment technology  removal efficiency
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号