首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Simulation of transpiration, drainage, N uptake, nitrate leaching, and N uptake concentration in tomato grown in open substrate
Authors:M. Gallardo,J.S. Rodrí  guez,M.D. Ferná  ndez,J.J. Magá  n
Affiliation:a Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Universidad de Almería, La Cañada, 04120 Almería, Spain
b Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Unidad Regional Universitaria de Zonas Áridas, Apartado Postal 8, Bermejillo, 35230 Durango, Mexico
c Departamento de Lenguajes y Computación, Universidad de Almería, La Cañada, 04120, Almería, Spain
d Estación Experimental de la Fundación Cajamar, Paraje Las Palmerillas No. 25, 04710 El Ejido, Almería, Spain
Abstract:Free-drainage or “open” substrate system used for vegetable production in greenhouses is associated with appreciable NO3 leaching losses and drainage volumes. Simulation models of crop N uptake, N leaching, water use and drainage of crops in these systems will be useful for crop and water resource management, and environmental assessment. This work (i) modified the TOMGRO model to simulate N uptake for tomato grown in greenhouses in SE Spain, (ii) modified the PrHo model to simulate transpiration of tomato grown in substrate and (iii) developed an aggregated model combining TOMGRO and PrHo to calculate N uptake concentrations and drainage NO3 concentration. The component models simulate NO3-N leached by subtracting simulated N uptake from measured applied N, and drainage by subtracting simulated transpiration from measured irrigation. Three tomato crops grown sequentially in free-draining rock wool in a plastic greenhouse were used for calibration and validation. Measured daily transpiration was determined by the water balance method from daily measurements of irrigation and drainage. Measured N uptake was determined by N balance, using data of volumes and of concentrations of NO3 and NH4+ in applied nutrient solution and drainage. Accuracy of the two modified component models and aggregated model was assessed by comparing simulated to measured values using linear regression analysis, comparison of slope and intercept values of regression equations, and root mean squared error (RMSE) values. For the three crops, the modified TOMGRO provided accurate simulations of cumulative crop N uptake, (RMSE = 6.4, 1.9 and 2.6% of total N uptake) and NO3-N leached (RMSE = 11.0, 10.3, and 6.1% of total NO3-N leached). The modified PrHo provided accurate simulation of cumulative transpiration (RMSE = 4.3, 1.7 and 2.4% of total transpiration) and cumulative drainage (RMSE = 13.8, 6.9, 7.4% of total drainage). For the four cumulative parameters, slopes and intercepts of the linear regressions were mostly not statistically significant (P < 0.05) from one and zero, respectively, and coefficient of determination (r2) values were 0.96-0.98. Simulated values of total drainage volumes for the three crops were +21, +1 and −13% of measured total drainage volumes. The aggregated TOMGRO-PrHo model generally provided accurate simulation of crop N uptake concentration after 30-40 days of transplanting, with an average RMSE of approximately 2 mmol L−1. Simulated values of average NO3 concentration in drainage, obtained with the aggregated model, were −7, +18 and +31% of measured values.
Keywords:DAT, days after transplanting   DM, dry matter   EC, electrical conductivity   ETc, crop evapotranspiration   ETo, reference evapotranspiration   Go, solar radiation   JD, Julian days   Kc, crop coefficient   LAI, leaf area index   PAR, photosynthetically active radiation   RMSE, root mean squared error   VPD, vapour pressure deficit   τ, greenhouse transmissivity
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号