首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

水稻种质资源抗灰飞虱评价及抗性机制分析
引用本文:段灿星,张世贤,陈青,程治军,翟虎渠,万建民. 水稻种质资源抗灰飞虱评价及抗性机制分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(4): 425-430
作者姓名:段灿星  张世贤  陈青  程治军  翟虎渠  万建民
作者单位:中国农业科学院 作物科学研究所/国家农作物基因资源与基因改良重大科学工程, 北京 100081; 2中国农业科学院 植物保护研究所, 北京 100094; 3中国农业科学院, 北京 100081; *通讯联系人, E-mail:wanjm@caas.net.cn
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划);国家科技攻关项目;农业结构调整技术专项基金
摘    要:通过改进的苗期集团筛选法,对138份水稻种质进行了抗灰飞虱鉴定与评价。筛选出对灰飞虱具有不同程度抗性的材料25份,占总鉴定材料的181%,其中高抗种质2份,抗性种质9份,中抗材料14份,粳稻品种明显比籼稻感虫。对部分材料进行的排驱性、抗生性试验及相关分析表明,Rathu Heenati(RHT)、Mudgo、Kasalath和IR36对灰飞虱具有强的排驱性和抗生性,其抗性水平与这两种抗虫机制密切相关;道人桥、羊毛谷的抗生性强,但排驱性弱,其主要抗虫机制表现为抗生性;Dular、ASD7和密阳23对灰飞虱具有较强的排驱性和抗生性,表明排驱性和抗生性是这3个品种的重要抗性类型;DV85具有较强的排驱性,但抗生性较弱,窄叶青8号和鬼衣谷具有中等水平的抗生性和排驱性,推测这3个材料具有较好的耐害特性。中抗材料9311的抗性水平由中等排驱性和抗生性控制,V20A的抗性主要表现为排驱性,明恢63和扬粳9538的排驱性和抗生性均较弱,暗示其抗性机制主要是耐害性。上述具有强抗生性或排驱性的材料是理想的抗灰飞虱资源。

关 键 词:水稻种质  灰飞虱  抗性评价  抗性机制  排驱性  抗生性  
文章编号:1001-7216(2007)04-0425-06
收稿时间:2006-10-26
修稿时间:2006-10-262007-04-21

Evaluation of Rice Germplasm for Resistance to the Small Brown Planthopper and Analysis on Resistance Mechanism
DUAN Can-xing,ZHANG Shi-xian,CHEN Qing,CHENG Zhi-jun,ZHAI Hu-qu,WAN Jian-min. Evaluation of Rice Germplasm for Resistance to the Small Brown Planthopper and Analysis on Resistance Mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2007, 21(4): 425-430
Authors:DUAN Can-xing  ZHANG Shi-xian  CHEN Qing  CHENG Zhi-jun  ZHAI Hu-qu  WAN Jian-min
Affiliation:1. Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Beijing 100081 , China ;2. Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China; 3.Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081 , China
Abstract:One hundred and thirty-eight rice accessions were evaluated for resistance to the small brown planthopper(SBPH)(Laodelphax striatellus Fallén)by seedbox screening test with modification.Twenty-five rice accessions with different levels of resistance to SBPH were detected,accounting for 18.1% of the total accessions,which included two highly resistant,nine resistant and 14 moderately resistant varieties.Compared with indica rice,japonica rice was more susceptible to SBPH.Antixenosis test,antibiosis test and correlation analysis were performed to elucidate the resistance mechanism.The highly resistant varieties such as Rathu Heenati(RHT),Mudgo and Kasalath and resistant variety IR36 expressed strong antixenosis and antibiosis against SBPH,indicating the close relationship between resistance level and these two resistance mechanisms in the four rice varieties.Antibiosis was the dominant resistance pattern in the resistant varieties Daorenqiao and Yangmaogu due to their high antibiosis.Dular,ASD7 and Milyang 23 had relatively strong antixenosis and antibiosis,indicating the two resistance mechanisms were significant in these three varieties.The resistant variety DV85 expressed relatively high level of antixenosis but low antibiosis,while Zhaiyeqing 8 and Guiyigu conferred only moderate antibiosis and antixenosis to SBPH,suggesting tolerance in these three varieties.Antibiosis and antixenosis governed the resistance to SBPH in the moderately resistant variety 9311.Antixenosis was the main resistance type in V20A.Tolerance was considered to be an important resistance mechanism in Minghui 63 and Yangjing 9538 due to their poor antibiosis and antixenosis resistance.The above accessions with strong antibiosis or antixenosis were the ideal materials for resistance breeding.
Keywords:rice germplasm  small brown planthopper   evaluation for resistance   resistance mechanism   antixenosis   antibiosis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国水稻科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国水稻科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号